bot: update RSS feed

This commit is contained in:
github-actions[bot]
2026-04-08 00:09:17 +00:00
parent b575d73ec5
commit 0d4aac2944

283
feed.xml
View File

@@ -7,111 +7,258 @@
<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
<generator>python-feedgen</generator>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:07:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Xpertbench: Expert Level Tasks with Rubrics-Based Evaluation</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02368</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.02368.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Xue Liu, Xin Ma, Yuxin Ma, Yongchang Peng, Duo Wang, Zhoufutu Wen, Ge Zhang, Kaiyuan Zhang, Xinyu Chen, Tianci He, Jiani Hou, Liang Hu, Ziyun Huang, Yongzhe Hui, Jianpeng Jiao, Chennan Ju, Yingru Kong, Yiran Li, Mengyun Liu, Luyao Ma, Fei Ni, Yiqing Ni, Yueyan Qiu, Yanle Ren, Zilin Shi, Zaiyuan Wang, Wenjie Yue, Shiyu Zhang, Xinyi Zhang, Kaiwen Zhao, Zhenwei Zhu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; As Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit plateauing performance on conventional benchmarks, a pivotal challenge persists: evaluating their proficiency in complex, open-ended tasks characterizing genuine expert-level cognition. Existing frameworks suffer from narrow domain coverage, reliance on generalist tasks, or self-evaluation biases. To bridge this gap, we present XpertBench, a high-fidelity benchmark engineered to assess LLMs across authentic professional domains. XpertBench consists of 1,346 meticulously curated tasks across 80 categories, spanning finance, healthcare, legal services, education, and dual-track research (STEM and Humanities). These tasks are derived from over 1,000 submissions by domain experts--including researchers from elite institutions and practitioners with extensive clinical or industrial experience--ensuring superior ecological validity. Each task uses detailed rubrics with mostly 15-40 weighted checkpoints to assess professional rigor. To facilitate scalable yet human-aligned assessment, we introduce ShotJudge, a novel evaluation paradigm that employs LLM judges calibrated with expert few-shot exemplars to mitigate self-rewarding biases. Our empirical evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs reveals a pronounced performance ceiling: even leading models achieve a peak success rate of only ~66%, with a mean score around 55%. Models also exhibit domain-specific divergence, showing non-overlapping strengths in quantitative reasoning versus linguistic synthesis.. These findings underscore a significant "expert-gap" in current AI systems and establish XpertBench as a critical instrument for navigating the transition from general-purpose assistants to specialized professional collaborators.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02368</guid>
<title>Self-Execution Simulation Improves Coding Models</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03253</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03253.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Gallil Maimon, Ori Yoran, Felix Kreuk, Michael Hassid, Gal Cohen, Pierre Chambon, Yossi Adi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 22&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; A promising research direction in enabling LLMs to generate consistently correct code involves addressing their inability to properly estimate program execution, particularly for code they generate. In this work, we demonstrate that Code LLMs can be trained to simulate program execution in a step-by-step manner and that this capability can be leveraged to improve competitive programming performance. Our approach combines supervised fine-tuning on natural language execution traces, textual explanations grounded in true execution, with reinforcement learning using verifiable rewards. We introduce two complementary objectives: output prediction given code and inputs, and solving competitive programming tasks with either ground-truth or self-predicted execution feedback. These objectives enable models to perform self-verification over multiple candidate solutions, and iterative self-fixing by simulating test execution. Across multiple competitive programming benchmarks, our method yields consistent improvements over standard reasoning approaches. We further present ablations and analysis to elucidate the role of execution simulation and its limitations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03253</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Emergent Compositional Communication for Latent World Properties</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03266</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03266.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Tomek Kaszyński&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Can multi-agent communication pressure extract discrete, compositional representations of invisible physical properties from frozen video features? We show that agents communicating through a Gumbel-Softmax bottleneck with iterated learning develop positionally disentangled protocols for latent properties (elasticity, friction, mass ratio) without property labels or supervision on message structure. With 4 agents, 100% of 80 seeds converge to near-perfect compositionality (PosDis=0.999, holdout 98.3%). Controls confirm multi-agent structure -- not bandwidth or temporal coverage -- drives this effect. Causal intervention shows surgical property disruption (~15% drop on targeted property, &lt;3% on others). A controlled backbone comparison reveals that the perceptual prior determines what is communicable: DINOv2 dominates on spatially-visible ramp physics (98.3% vs 95.1%), while V-JEPA 2 dominates on dynamics-only collision physics (87.4% vs 77.7%, d=2.74). Scale-matched (d=3.37) and frame-matched (d=6.53) controls attribute this gap entirely to video-native pretraining. The frozen protocol supports action-conditioned planning (91.5%) with counterfactual velocity reasoning (r=0.780). Validation on Physics 101 real camera footage confirms 85.6% mass-comparison accuracy on unseen objects, temporal dynamics contributing +11.2% beyond static appearance, agent-scaling compositionality replicating at 90% for 4 agents, and causal intervention extending to real video (d=1.87, p=0.022).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03266</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scaling Teams or Scaling Time? Memory Enabled Lifelong Learning in LLM Multi-Agent Systems</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03295</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03295.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Shanglin Wu, Yuyang Luo, Yueqing Liang, Kaiwen Shi, Yanfang Ye, Ali Payani, Kai Shu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Large language model (LLM) multi-agent systems can scale along two distinct dimensions: by increasing the number of agents and by improving through accumulated experience over time. Although prior work has studied these dimensions separately, their interaction under realistic cost constraints remains unclear. In this paper, we introduce a conceptual scaling view of multi-agent systems that jointly considers team size and lifelong learning ability, and we study how memory design shares this landscape. To this end, we propose LLMA-Mem, a lifelong memory framework for LLM multi-agent systems under flexible memory topologies. We evaluate LLMA-Mem on MultiAgentBench across coding, research, and database environments. Empirically, LLMA-Mem consistently improves long-horizon performance over baselines while reducing cost. Our analysis further reveals a non-monotonic scaling landscape: larger teams do not always produce better long-term performance, and smaller teams can outperform larger ones when memory better supports the reuse of experience. These findings position memory design as a practical path for scaling multi-agent systems more effectively and more efficiently over time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03295</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Communicating about Space: Language-Mediated Spatial Integration Across Partial Views</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27183</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2603.27183.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Ankur Sikarwar, Debangan Mishra, Sudarshan Nikhil, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Aishwarya Agrawal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 12&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Humans build shared spatial understanding by communicating partial, viewpoint-dependent observations. We ask whether Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can do the same, aligning distinct egocentric views through dialogue to form a coherent, allocentric mental model of a shared environment. To study this systematically, we introduce COSMIC, a benchmark for Collaborative Spatial Communication. In this setting, two static MLLM agents observe a 3D indoor environment from different viewpoints and exchange natural-language messages to solve spatial queries. COSMIC contains 899 diverse scenes and 1250 question-answer pairs spanning five tasks. We find a consistent capability hierarchy, MLLMs are most reliable at identifying shared anchor objects across views, perform worse on relational reasoning, and largely fail at building globally consistent maps, performing near chance, even for the frontier models. Moreover, we find thinking capability yields consistent gains in anchor grounding, but is insufficient for higher-level spatial communication. To contextualize model behavior, we additionally collect 250 human-human dialogues. Humans achieve 95% aggregate accuracy, leaving significant room for improvement for even the best performing model Gemini-3-Pro-Thinking which achieves 72% aggregate accuracy. Moreover, human conversations become increasingly specific as partners converge on a shared mental model, whereas model dialogues continue to explore new possibilities rather than converging, consistent with a limited ability to build and maintain a robust shared mental model. Our code and data is available at https://github.com/ankursikarwar/Cosmic&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27183</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
<title>LIBERO-Para: A Diagnostic Benchmark and Metrics for Paraphrase Robustness in VLA Models</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28301</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2603.28301.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Chanyoung Kim, Minwoo Kim, Minseok Kang, Hyunwoo Kim, Dahuin Jung&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 71&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve strong performance in robotic manipulation by leveraging pre-trained vision-language backbones. However, in downstream robotic settings, they are typically fine-tuned with limited data, leading to overfitting to specific instruction formulations and leaving robustness to paraphrased instructions underexplored. To study this gap, we introduce LIBERO-Para, a controlled benchmark that independently varies action expressions and object references for fine-grained analysis of linguistic generalization. Across seven VLA configurations (0.6B-7.5B), we observe consistent performance degradation of 22-52 pp under paraphrasing. This degradation is primarily driven by object-level lexical variation: even simple synonym substitutions cause large drops, indicating reliance on surface-level matching rather than semantic grounding. Moreover, 80-96% of failures arise from planning-level trajectory divergence rather than execution errors, showing that paraphrasing disrupts task identification. Binary success rate treats all paraphrases equally, obscuring whether models perform consistently across difficulty levels or rely on easier cases. To address this, we propose PRIDE, a metric that quantifies paraphrase difficulty using semantic and syntactic factors. Our benchmark and corresponding code are available at: https://github.com/cau-hai-lab/LIBERO-Para&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28301</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Do World Action Models Generalize Better than VLAs? A Robustness Study</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22078</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2603.22078.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Zhanguang Zhang, Zhiyuan Li, Behnam Rahmati, Rui Heng Yang, Yintao Ma, Amir Rasouli, Sajjad Pakdamansavoji, Yangzheng Wu, Lingfeng Zhang, Tongtong Cao, Feng Wen, Xinyu Wang, Xingyue Quan, Yingxue Zhang&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Robot action planning in the real world is challenging as it requires not only understanding the current state of the environment but also predicting how it will evolve in response to actions. Vision-language-action (VLA), which repurpose large-scale vision-language models for robot action generation using action experts, have achieved notable success across a variety of robotic tasks. Nevertheless, their performance remains constrained by the scope of their training data, exhibiting limited generalization to unseen scenarios and vulnerability to diverse contextual perturbations. More recently, world models have been revisited as an alternative to VLAs. These models, referred to as world action models (WAMs), are built upon world models that are trained on large corpora of video data to predict future states. With minor adaptations, their latent representation can be decoded into robot actions. It has been suggested that their explicit dynamic prediction capacity, combined with spatiotemporal priors acquired from web-scale video pretraining, enables WAMs to generalize more effectively than VLAs. In this paper, we conduct a comparative study of prominent state-of-the-art VLA policies and recently released WAMs. We evaluate their performance on the LIBERO-Plus and RoboTwin 2.0-Plus benchmarks under various visual and language perturbations. Our results show that WAMs achieve strong robustness, with LingBot-VA reaching 74.2% success rate on RoboTwin 2.0-Plus and Cosmos-Policy achieving 82.2% on LIBERO-Plus. While VLAs such as π_{0.5} can achieve comparable robustness on certain tasks, they typically require extensive training with diverse robotic datasets and varied learning objectives. Hybrid approaches that partially incorporate video-based dynamic learning exhibit intermediate robustness, highlighting the importance of how video priors are integrated.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22078</guid>
<title>Locally Confident, Globally Stuck: The Quality-Exploration Dilemma in Diffusion Language Models</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00375</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.00375.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Liancheng Fang, Aiwei Liu, Henry Peng Zou, Yankai Chen, Enze Ma, Leyi Pan, Chunyu Miao, Wei-Chieh Huang, Xue Liu, Philip S. Yu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 0&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) theoretically permit token decoding in arbitrary order, a flexibility that could enable richer exploration of reasoning paths than autoregressive (AR) LLMs. In practice, however, random-order decoding often hurts generation quality. To mitigate this, low-confidence remasking improves single-sample quality (e.g., Pass@1) by prioritizing confident tokens, but it also suppresses exploration and limits multi-sample gains (e.g., Pass@k), creating a fundamental quality--exploration dilemma. In this paper, we provide a unified explanation of this dilemma. We show that low-confidence remasking improves a myopic proxy for quality while provably constraining the entropy of the induced sequence distribution. To overcome this limitation, we characterize the optimal distribution that explicitly balances quality and exploration, and develop a simple Independent Metropolis--Hastings sampler that approximately targets this distribution during decoding. Experiments across a range of reasoning benchmarks including MATH500, AIME24/25, HumanEval, and MBPP show that our approach yields better exploration-quality tradeoff than both random and low-confidence remasking.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00375</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AgentSocialBench: Evaluating Privacy Risks in Human-Centered Agentic Social Networks</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01487</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.01487.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Prince Zizhuang Wang, Shuli Jiang&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 4&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; With the rise of personalized, persistent LLM agent frameworks such as OpenClaw, human-centered agentic social networks in which teams of collaborative AI agents serve individual users in a social network across multiple domains are becoming a reality. This setting creates novel privacy challenges: agents must coordinate across domain boundaries, mediate between humans, and interact with other users' agents, all while protecting sensitive personal information. While prior work has evaluated multi-agent coordination and privacy preservation, the dynamics and privacy risks of human-centered agentic social networks remain unexplored. To this end, we introduce AgentSocialBench, the first benchmark to systematically evaluate privacy risk in this setting, comprising scenarios across seven categories spanning dyadic and multi-party interactions, grounded in realistic user profiles with hierarchical sensitivity labels and directed social graphs. Our experiments reveal that privacy in agentic social networks is fundamentally harder than in single-agent settings: (1) cross-domain and cross-user coordination creates persistent leakage pressure even when agents are explicitly instructed to protect information, (2) privacy instructions that teach agents how to abstract sensitive information paradoxically cause them to discuss it more (we call it abstraction paradox). These findings underscore that current LLM agents lack robust mechanisms for privacy preservation in human-centered agentic social networks, and that new approaches beyond prompt engineering are needed to make agent-mediated social coordination safe for real-world deployment.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01487</guid>
<title>Type-Checked Compliance: Deterministic Guardrails for Agentic Financial Systems Using Lean 4 Theorem Proving</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01483</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.01483.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Devakh Rashie, Veda Rashi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; The rapid evolution of autonomous, agentic artificial intelligence within financial services has introduced an existential architectural crisis: large language models (LLMs) are probabilistic, non-deterministic systems operating in domains that demand absolute, mathematically verifiable compliance guarantees. Existing guardrail solutions -- including NVIDIA NeMo Guardrails and Guardrails AI -- rely on probabilistic classifiers and syntactic validators that are fundamentally inadequate for enforcing complex multi-variable regulatory constraints mandated by the SEC, FINRA, and OCC. This paper presents the Lean-Agent Protocol, a formal-verification-based AI guardrail platform that leverages the Aristotle neural-symbolic model developed by Harmonic AI to auto-formalize institutional policies into Lean 4 code. Every proposed agentic action is treated as a mathematical conjecture: execution is permitted if and only if the Lean 4 kernel proves that the action satisfies pre-compiled regulatory axioms. This architecture provides cryptographic-level compliance certainty at microsecond latency, directly satisfying SEC Rule 15c3-5, OCC Bulletin 2011-12, FINRA Rule 3110, and CFPB explainability mandates. A three-phase implementation roadmap from shadow verification through enterprise-scale deployment is provided.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01483</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Test-Time Scaling Makes Overtraining Compute-Optimal</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01411</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.01411.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Nicholas Roberts, Sungjun Cho, Zhiqi Gao, Tzu-Heng Huang, Albert Wu, Gabriel Orlanski, Avi Trost, Kelly Buchanan, Aws Albarghouthi, Frederic Sala&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 14&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Modern LLMs scale at test-time, e.g. via repeated sampling, where inference cost grows with model size and the number of samples. This creates a trade-off that pretraining scaling laws, such as Chinchilla, do not address. We present Train-to-Test (T^2) scaling laws that jointly optimize model size, training tokens, and number of inference samples under fixed end-to-end budgets. T^2 modernizes pretraining scaling laws with pass@k modeling used for test-time scaling, then jointly optimizes pretraining and test-time decisions. Forecasts from T^2 are robust over distinct modeling approaches: measuring joint scaling effect on the task loss and modeling impact on task accuracy. Across eight downstream tasks, we find that when accounting for inference cost, optimal pretraining decisions shift radically into the overtraining regime, well-outside of the range of standard pretraining scaling suites. We validate our results by pretraining heavily overtrained models in the optimal region that T^2 scaling forecasts, confirming their substantially stronger performance compared to pretraining scaling alone. Finally, as frontier LLMs are post-trained, we show that our findings survive the post-training stage, making T^2 scaling meaningful in modern deployments.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01411</guid>
<title>ONE-SHOT: Compositional Human-Environment Video Synthesis via Spatial-Decoupled Motion Injection and Hybrid Context Integration</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01043</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.01043.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Fengyuan Yang, Luying Huang, Jiazhi Guan, Quanwei Yang, Dongwei Pan, Jianglin Fu, Haocheng Feng, Wei He, Kaisiyuan Wang, Hang Zhou, Angela Yao&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 7&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Recent advances in Video Foundation Models (VFMs) have revolutionized human-centric video synthesis, yet fine-grained and independent editing of subjects and scenes remains a critical challenge. Recent attempts to incorporate richer environment control through rigid 3D geometric compositions often encounter a stark trade-off between precise control and generative flexibility. Furthermore, the heavy 3D pre-processing still limits practical scalability. In this paper, we propose ONE-SHOT, a parameter-efficient framework for compositional human-environment video generation. Our key insight is to factorize the generative process into disentangled signals. Specifically, we introduce a canonical-space injection mechanism that decouples human dynamics from environmental cues via cross-attention. We also propose Dynamic-Grounded-RoPE, a novel positional embedding strategy that establishes spatial correspondences between disparate spatial domains without any heuristic 3D alignments. To support long-horizon synthesis, we introduce a Hybrid Context Integration mechanism to maintain subject and scene consistency across minute-level generations. Experiments demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, offering superior structural control and creative diversity for video synthesis. Our project has been available on: https://martayang.github.io/ONE-SHOT/.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01043</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>VLMs Need Words: Vision Language Models Ignore Visual Detail In Favor of Semantic Anchors</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02486</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.02486.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Haz Sameen Shahgir, Xiaofu Chen, Yu Fu, Erfan Shayegani, Nael Abu-Ghazaleh, Yova Kementchedjhieva, Yue Dong&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Vision Language Models (VLMs) achieve impressive performance across a wide range of multimodal tasks. However, on some tasks that demand fine-grained visual perception, they often fail even when the required information is present in their internal representations. In this work, we demonstrate that this gap arises from their narrow training pipeline which focuses on moving visual information to the textual space. Consequently, VLMs can only reason about visual entities that can be mapped to known concepts in the language space, leaving vision-focused tasks such as visual correspondence and reasoning about novel visual entities poorly supported. As a result, VLMs are severely limited in several important multimodal capabilities because they rely on brittle, hallucinated textual descriptions of visual entities that they cannot map to textual representations. We verify this behavior through visual correspondence tasks, in which VLMs must detect matching entities between two images. Testing across semantic, shape, and face correspondence tasks, we find that VLMs perform much better when the relevant entities are nameable in language than when they are unnameable. Mechanistically, our Logit Lens analyses confirm that VLMs explicitly assign semantic labels to nameable entities and surface more unique corresponding tokens compared to unnameable entities. Furthermore, we show that teaching completely arbitrary names for unknown entities improves performance, yet task-specific finetuning yields even stronger generalization without relying on language priors. Our findings suggest that current VLM failures on visual tasks reflect learned shortcuts from their training, rather than a fundamental limitation of multimodal architectures.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02486</guid>
<title>BidirLM: From Text to Omnimodal Bidirectional Encoders by Adapting and Composing Causal LLMs</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02045</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.02045.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Nicolas Boizard, Théo Deschamps-Berger, Hippolyte Gisserot-Boukhlef, Céline Hudelot, Pierre Colombo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Transforming causal generative language models into bidirectional encoders offers a powerful alternative to BERT-style architectures. However, current approaches remain limited: they lack consensus on optimal training objectives, suffer from catastrophic forgetting at scale, and fail to flexibly integrate the vast ecosystem of specialized generative models. In this work, through systematic ablations on the Gemma3 and Qwen3 families, we identify the key factors driving successful adaptation, highlighting the critical role of an often-omitted prior masking phase. To scale this process without original pre-training data, we introduce a dual strategy combining linear weight merging with a lightweight multi-domain data mixture that mitigates catastrophic forgetting. Finally, we augment our encoders by merging them with specialized causal models, seamlessly transferring modality- and domain-specific capabilities. This open-source recipe, designed for any causal decoder LLM, yields BidirLM, a family of five encoders that outperform alternatives on text, vision, and audio representation benchmarks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02045</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Swift-SVD: Theoretical Optimality Meets Practical Efficiency in Low-Rank LLM Compression</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01609</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.01609.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Ruoling Qi, Yirui Liu, Xuaner Wu, Xiangyu Wang, Ming Li, Chen Chen, Jian Chen, Yin Chen, Qizhen Weng&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 3&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; The deployment of Large Language Models is constrained by the memory and bandwidth demands of static weights and dynamic Key-Value cache. SVD-based compression provides a hardware-friendly solution to reduce these costs. However, existing methods suffer from two key limitations: some are suboptimal in reconstruction error, while others are theoretically optimal but practically inefficient. In this paper, we propose Swift-SVD, an activation-aware, closed-form compression framework that simultaneously guarantees theoretical optimum, practical efficiency and numerical stability. Swift-SVD incrementally aggregates covariance of output activations given a batch of inputs and performs a single eigenvalue decomposition after aggregation, enabling training-free, fast, and optimal layer-wise low-rank approximation. We employ effective rank to analyze local layer-wise compressibility and design a dynamic rank allocation strategy that jointly accounts for local reconstruction loss and end-to-end layer importance. Extensive experiments across six LLMs and eight datasets demonstrate that Swift-SVD outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving optimal compression accuracy while delivering 3-70X speedups in end-to-end compression time. Our code will be released upon acceptance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01609</guid>
<title>Learning to Learn-at-Test-Time: Language Agents with Learnable Adaptation Policies</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00830</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.00830.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Zhanzhi Lou, Hui Chen, Yibo Li, Qian Wang, Bryan Hooi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 7&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Test-Time Learning (TTL) enables language agents to iteratively refine their performance through repeated interactions with the environment at inference time. At the core of TTL is an adaptation policy that updates the actor policy based on experience from previous episodes, thereby improving future behavior. Existing methods rely on fixed, hand-crafted adaptation policies rather than optimizing them for downstream improvement. We argue that optimal adaptation policies should be learned from task environments, not hand-engineered based on human intuition. To achieve this, we introduce Meta-TTL, a framework that formulates the discovery of effective adaptation policies as a bi-level optimization problem. Within this framework, the inner loop executes the standard TTL process, measuring how effectively a candidate adaptation policy helps an agent correct errors across sequential episodes. Guided by the agent's performance, the outer loop employs evolutionary search over a diverse distribution of training tasks to iteratively refine the adaptation policy. We evaluate Meta-TTL on Jericho and WebArena-Lite across both in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) settings, using multiple meta-agent backbones. Results on both benchmarks show that Meta-TTL consistently outperforms hand-crafted baselines, suggesting that the optimized adaptation policy encodes transferable strategies that generalize beyond the training task distribution.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00830</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Simple Baseline for Streaming Video Understanding</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02317</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.02317.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Yujiao Shen, Shulin Tian, Jingkang Yang, Ziwei Liu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 53&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Recent streaming video understanding methods increasingly rely on complex memory mechanisms to handle long video streams. We challenge this trend with a simple finding: a sliding-window baseline that feeds only the most recent N frames to an off-the-shelf VLM already matches or surpasses published streaming models. We formalize this baseline as SimpleStream and evaluate it against 13 major offline and online video LLM baselines on OVO-Bench and StreamingBench. Despite its simplicity, SimpleStream delivers consistently strong performance. With only 4 recent frames, it reaches 67.7% average accuracy on OVO-Bench and 80.59% on StreamingBench. Controlled ablations further show that the value of longer context is backbone-dependent rather than uniformly increasing with model scale, and reveal a consistent perception-memory trade-off: adding more historical context can improve recall, but often weakens real-time perception. This suggests that stronger memory, retrieval, or compression modules should not be taken as evidence of progress unless they clearly outperform SimpleStream under the same protocol. We therefore argue that future streaming benchmarks should separate recent-scene perception from long-range memory, so that performance improvements from added complexity can be evaluated more clearly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02317</guid>
<title>PLUME: Latent Reasoning Based Universal Multimodal Embedding</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02073</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.02073.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Chenwei He, Xiangzhao Hao, Tianyu Yang, Yuxiang Ma, Yuheng Jia, Lingxiang Wu, Chaoyang Zhao, Haiyun Guo, Jinqiao Wang&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 8&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Universal multimodal embedding (UME) maps heterogeneous inputs into a shared retrieval space with a single model. Recent approaches improve UME by generating explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) rationales before extracting embeddings, enabling multimodal large language models to better infer complex query intent. However, explicit CoT incurs substantial inference overhead and can compress rich multimodal evidence into a narrow textual bottleneck. We propose PLUME, a latent reasoning framework that advances UME by replacing verbalized CoT with a short autoregressive rollout of continuous latent states. To support diverse multimodal queries, PLUME further introduces a semantic-anchor-guided transition adapter that steers latent rollout along different reasoning trajectories under the same fixed computation budget. To stabilize training, PLUME adopts a progressive explicit-to-latent curriculum that uses verbalized reasoning only as a temporary training scaffold and gradually transfers this behavior into hidden-state computation, eliminating explicit CoT at inference. On the 78-task MMEB-v2 benchmark, PLUME outperforms strong explicit-CoT UME baselines while reducing reasoning from hundreds of generated tokens to fewer than 10 latent steps, delivering over 30x faster inference. PLUME is especially well suited to retrieval settings where relevant evidence is dense, structurally complex, and difficult to organize through verbalized intermediate rationales, such as video and visual document retrieval. These results show that structured latent computation can preserve the benefits of intermediate reasoning without the overhead of explicit rationale generation, providing a stronger and more efficient paradigm for practical retrieval systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02073</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CoME-VL: Scaling Complementary Multi-Encoder Vision-Language Learning</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03231</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03231.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Ankan Deria, Komal Kumar, Xilin He, Imran Razzak, Hisham Cholakkal, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Salman Khan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Recent vision-language models (VLMs) typically rely on a single vision encoder trained with contrastive image-text objectives, such as CLIP-style pretraining. While contrastive encoders are effective for cross-modal alignment and retrieval, self-supervised visual encoders often capture richer dense semantics and exhibit stronger robustness on recognition and understanding tasks. In this work, we investigate how to scale the fusion of these complementary visual representations for vision-language modeling. We propose CoME-VL: Complementary Multi-Encoder Vision-Language, a modular fusion framework that integrates a contrastively trained vision encoder with a self-supervised DINO encoder. Our approach performs representation-level fusion by (i) entropy-guided multi-layer aggregation with orthogonality-constrained projections to reduce redundancy, and (ii) RoPE-enhanced cross-attention to align heterogeneous token grids and produce compact fused visual tokens. The fused tokens can be injected into a decoder-only LLM with minimal changes to standard VLM pipelines. Extensive experiments across diverse vision-language benchmarks demonstrate that CoME-VL consistently outperforms single-encoder baselines. In particular, we observe an average improvement of 4.9% on visual understanding tasks and 5.4% on grounding tasks. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on RefCOCO for detection while improving over the baseline by a large margin. Finally, we conduct ablation studies on layer merging, non-redundant feature mixing, and fusion capacity to evaluate how complementary contrastive and self-supervised signals affect VLM performance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03231</guid>
<title>Unifying Group-Relative and Self-Distillation Policy Optimization via Sample Routing</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02288</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.02288.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Gengsheng Li, Tianyu Yang, Junfeng Fang, Mingyang Song, Mao Zheng, Haiyun Guo, Dan Zhang, Jinqiao Wang, Tat-Seng Chua&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 23&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a standard paradigm for post-training large language models. While Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is widely adopted, its coarse credit assignment uniformly penalizes failed rollouts, lacking the token-level focus needed to efficiently address specific deviations. Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (SDPO) addresses this by providing denser, more targeted logit-level supervision that facilitates rapid early improvement, yet it frequently collapses during prolonged training. We trace this late-stage instability to two intrinsic flaws: self-distillation on already-correct samples introduces optimization ambiguity, and the self-teacher's signal reliability progressively degrades. To resolve these issues, we propose Sample-Routed Policy Optimization (SRPO), a unified on-policy framework that routes correct samples to GRPO's reward-aligned reinforcement and failed samples to SDPO's targeted logit-level correction. SRPO further incorporates an entropy-aware dynamic weighting mechanism to suppress high-entropy, unreliable distillation targets while emphasizing confident ones. Evaluated across five benchmarks and two model scales, SRPO achieves both the rapid early improvement of SDPO and the long-horizon stability of GRPO. It consistently surpasses the peak performance of both baselines, raising the five-benchmark average on Qwen3-8B by 3.4% over GRPO and 6.3% over SDPO, while simultaneously yielding moderate response lengths and lowering per-step compute cost by up to 17.2%.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02288</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Adam's Law: Textual Frequency Law on Large Language Models</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02176</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.02176.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Hongyuan Adam Lu, Z. L., Victor Wei, Zefan Zhang, Zhao Hong, Qiqi Xiang, Bowen Cao, Wai Lam&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 45&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; While textual frequency has been validated as relevant to human cognition in reading speed, its relatedness to Large Language Models (LLMs) is seldom studied. We propose a novel research direction in terms of textual data frequency, which is an understudied topic, to the best of our knowledge. Our framework is composed of three units. First, this paper proposes Textual Frequency Law (TFL), which indicates that frequent textual data should be preferred for LLMs for both prompting and fine-tuning. Since many LLMs are closed-source in their training data, we propose using online resources to estimate the sentence-level frequency. We then utilize an input paraphraser to paraphrase the input into a more frequent textual expression. Next, we propose Textual Frequency Distillation (TFD) by querying LLMs to conduct story completion by further extending the sentences in the datasets, and the resulting corpora are used to adjust the initial estimation. Finally, we propose Curriculum Textual Frequency Training (CTFT) that fine-tunes LLMs in an increasing order of sentence-level frequency. Experiments are conducted on our curated dataset Textual Frequency Paired Dataset (TFPD) on math reasoning, machine translation, commonsense reasoning and agentic tool calling. Results show the effectiveness of our framework.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02176</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Do Audio-Visual Large Language Models Really See and Hear?</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02605</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.02605.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Ramaneswaran Selvakumar, Kaousheik Jayakumar, S Sakshi, Sreyan Ghosh, Ruohan Gao, Dinesh Manocha&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Audio-Visual Large Language Models (AVLLMs) are emerging as unified interfaces to multimodal perception. We present the first mechanistic interpretability study of AVLLMs, analyzing how audio and visual features evolve and fuse through different layers of an AVLLM to produce the final text outputs. We find that although AVLLMs encode rich audio semantics at intermediate layers, these capabilities largely fail to surface in the final text generation when audio conflicts with vision. Probing analyses show that useful latent audio information is present, but deeper fusion layers disproportionately privilege visual representations that tend to suppress audio cues. We further trace this imbalance to training: the AVLLM's audio behavior strongly matches its vision-language base model, indicating limited additional alignment to audio supervision. Our findings reveal a fundamental modality bias in AVLLMs and provide new mechanistic insights into how multimodal LLMs integrate audio and vision.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02605</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Salt: Self-Consistent Distribution Matching with Cache-Aware Training for Fast Video Generation</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03118</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03118.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Xingtong Ge, Yi Zhang, Yushi Huang, Dailan He, Xiahong Wang, Bingqi Ma, Guanglu Song, Yu Liu, Jun Zhang&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Distilling video generation models to extremely low inference budgets (e.g., 2--4 NFEs) is crucial for real-time deployment, yet remains challenging. Trajectory-style consistency distillation often becomes conservative under complex video dynamics, yielding an over-smoothed appearance and weak motion. Distribution matching distillation (DMD) can recover sharp, mode-seeking samples, but its local training signals do not explicitly regularize how denoising updates compose across timesteps, making composed rollouts prone to drift. To overcome this challenge, we propose Self-Consistent Distribution Matching Distillation (SC-DMD), which explicitly regularizes the endpoint-consistent composition of consecutive denoising updates. For real-time autoregressive video generation, we further treat the KV cache as a quality parameterized condition and propose Cache-Distribution-Aware training. This training scheme applies SC-DMD over multi-step rollouts and introduces a cache-conditioned feature alignment objective that steers low-quality outputs toward high-quality references. Across extensive experiments on both non-autoregressive backbones (e.g., Wan~2.1) and autoregressive real-time paradigms (e.g., Self Forcing), our method, dubbed Salt, consistently improves low-NFE video generation quality while remaining compatible with diverse KV-cache memory mechanisms. Source code will be released at https://github.com/XingtongGe/Salt{https://github.com/XingtongGe/Salt}.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03118</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<title>POEMetric: The Last Stanza of Humanity</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03695</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03695.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Bingru Li, Han Wang, Hazel Wilkinson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Large Language Models (LLMs) can compose poetry, but how far are they from human poets? In this paper, we introduce POEMetric, the first comprehensive framework for poetry evaluation, examining 1) basic instruction-following abilities in generating poems according to a certain form and theme, 2) advanced abilities of showing creativity, lexical diversity, and idiosyncrasy, evoking emotional resonance, and using imagery and literary devices, and 3) general appraisal of the overall poem quality and estimation of authorship. We curated a human poem dataset - 203 English poems of 7 fixed forms annotated with meter, rhyme patterns and themes - and experimented with 30 LLMs for poetry generation based on the same forms and themes of the human data, totaling 6,090 LLM poems. Based on POEMetric, we assessed the performance of both human poets and LLMs through rule-based evaluation and LLM-as-a-judge, whose results were validated by human experts. Results show that, though the top model achieved high form accuracy (4.26 out of 5.00, with Gemini-2.5-Pro as a judge; same below) and theme alignment (4.99), all models failed to reach the same level of advanced abilities as human poets, who achieved unparalleled creativity (4.02), idiosyncrasy (3.95), emotional resonance (4.06), and skillful use of imagery (4.49) and literary devices (4.67). Humans also defeated the best-performing LLM in overall poem quality (4.22 vs. 3.20). As such, poetry generation remains a formidable challenge for LLMs. Data and codes are released at https://github.com/Bingru-Li/POEMetric.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03695</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AgentHazard: A Benchmark for Evaluating Harmful Behavior in Computer-Use Agents</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02947</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.02947.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Yunhao Feng, Yifan Ding, Yingshui Tan, Xingjun Ma, Yige Li, Yutao Wu, Yifeng Gao, Kun Zhai, Yanming Guo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Computer-use agents extend language models from text generation to persistent action over tools, files, and execution environments. Unlike chat systems, they maintain state across interactions and translate intermediate outputs into concrete actions. This creates a distinct safety challenge in that harmful behavior may emerge through sequences of individually plausible steps, including intermediate actions that appear locally acceptable but collectively lead to unauthorized actions. We present AgentHazard, a benchmark for evaluating harmful behavior in computer-use agents. AgentHazard contains 2,653 instances spanning diverse risk categories and attack strategies. Each instance pairs a harmful objective with a sequence of operational steps that are locally legitimate but jointly induce unsafe behavior. The benchmark evaluates whether agents can recognize and interrupt harm arising from accumulated context, repeated tool use, intermediate actions, and dependencies across steps. We evaluate AgentHazard on Claude Code, OpenClaw, and IFlow using mostly open or openly deployable models from the Qwen3, Kimi, GLM, and DeepSeek families. Our experimental results indicate that current systems remain highly vulnerable. In particular, when powered by Qwen3-Coder, Claude Code exhibits an attack success rate of 73.63\%, suggesting that model alignment alone does not reliably guarantee the safety of autonomous agents.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02947</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<title>SciLT: Long-Tailed Classification in Scientific Image Domains</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03687</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03687.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Jiahao Chen, Bing Su&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 3&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Long-tailed recognition has benefited from foundation models and fine-tuning paradigms, yet existing studies and benchmarks are mainly confined to natural image domains, where pre-training and fine-tuning data share similar distributions. In contrast, scientific images exhibit distinct visual characteristics and supervision signals, raising questions about the effectiveness of fine-tuning foundation models in such settings. In this work, we investigate scientific long-tailed recognition under a purely visual and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) paradigm. Experiments on three scientific benchmarks show that fine-tuning foundation models yields limited gains, and reveal that penultimate-layer features play an important role, particularly for tail classes. Motivated by these findings, we propose SciLT, a framework that exploits multi-level representations through adaptive feature fusion and dual-supervision learning. By jointly leveraging penultimate- and final-layer features, SciLT achieves balanced performance across head and tail classes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SciLT consistently outperforms existing methods, establishing a strong and practical baseline for scientific long-tailed recognition and providing valuable guidance for adapting foundation models to scientific data with substantial domain shifts.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03687</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>InCoder-32B-Thinking: Industrial Code World Model for Thinking</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03144</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03144.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Jian Yang, Wei Zhang, Jiajun Wu, Junhang Cheng, Tuney Zheng, Fanglin Xu, Weicheng Gu, Lin Jing, Yaxin Du, Joseph Li, Yizhi Li, Yan Xing, Chuan Hao, Ran Tao, Ruihao Gong, Aishan Liu, Zhoujun Li, Mingjie Tang, Chenghua Lin, Siheng Chen, Wayne Xin Zhao, Xianglong Liu, Ming Zhou, Bryan Dai, Weifeng Lv&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 6&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Industrial software development across chip design, GPU optimization, and embedded systems lacks expert reasoning traces showing how engineers reason about hardware constraints and timing semantics. In this work, we propose InCoder-32B-Thinking, trained on the data from the Error-driven Chain-of-Thought (ECoT) synthesis framework with an industrial code world model (ICWM) to generate reasoning traces. Specifically, ECoT generates reasoning chains by synthesizing the thinking content from multi-turn dialogue with environmental error feedback, explicitly modeling the error-correction process. ICWM is trained on domain-specific execution traces from Verilog simulation, GPU profiling, etc., learns the causal dynamics of how code affects hardware behavior, and enables self-verification by predicting execution outcomes before actual compilation. All synthesized reasoning traces are validated through domain toolchains, creating training data matching the natural reasoning depth distribution of industrial tasks. Evaluation on 14 general (81.3% on LiveCodeBench v5) and 9 industrial benchmarks (84.0% in CAD-Coder and 38.0% on KernelBench) shows InCoder-32B-Thinking achieves top-tier open-source results across all domains.GPU Optimization&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03144</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<title>LightThinker++: From Reasoning Compression to Memory Management</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03679</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03679.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Yuqi Zhu, Jintian Zhang, Zhenjie Wan, Yujie Luo, Shuofei Qiao, Zhengke Gui, Da Zheng, Lei Liang, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 24&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Large language models (LLMs) excel at complex reasoning, yet their efficiency is limited by the surging cognitive overhead of long thought traces. In this paper, we propose LightThinker, a method that enables LLMs to dynamically compress intermediate thoughts into compact semantic representations. However, static compression often struggles with complex reasoning where the irreversible loss of intermediate details can lead to logical bottlenecks. To address this, we evolve the framework into LightThinker++, introducing Explicit Adaptive Memory Management. This paradigm shifts to behavioral-level management by incorporating explicit memory primitives, supported by a specialized trajectory synthesis pipeline to train purposeful memory scheduling. Extensive experiments demonstrate the framework's versatility across three dimensions. (1) LightThinker reduces peak token usage by 70% and inference time by 26% with minimal accuracy loss. (2) In standard reasoning, LightThinker++ slashes peak token usage by 69.9% while yielding a +2.42% accuracy gain under the same context budget for maximum performance. (3) Most notably, in long-horizon agentic tasks, it maintains a stable footprint beyond 80 rounds (a 60%-70% reduction), achieving an average performance gain of 14.8% across different complex scenarios. Overall, our work provides a scalable direction for sustaining deep LLM reasoning over extended horizons with minimal overhead.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03679</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agentic-MME: What Agentic Capability Really Brings to Multimodal Intelligence?</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03016</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03016.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Qianshan Wei, Yishan Yang, Siyi Wang, Jinglin Chen, Binyu Wang, Jiaming Wang, Shuang Chen, Zechen Li, Yang Shi, Yuqi Tang, Weining Wang, Yi Yu, Chaoyou Fu, Qi Li, Yi-Fan Zhang&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 21&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are evolving from passive observers into active agents, solving problems through Visual Expansion (invoking visual tools) and Knowledge Expansion (open-web search). However, existing evaluations fall short: they lack flexible tool integration, test visual and search tools separately, and evaluate primarily by final answers. Consequently, they cannot verify if tools were actually invoked, applied correctly, or used efficiently. To address this, we introduce Agentic-MME, a process-verified benchmark for Multimodal Agentic Capabilities. It contains 418 real-world tasks across 6 domains and 3 difficulty levels to evaluate capability synergy, featuring over 2,000 stepwise checkpoints that average 10+ person-hours of manual annotation per task. Each task includes a unified evaluation framework supporting sandboxed code and APIs, alongside a human reference trajectory annotated with stepwise checkpoints along dual-axis: S-axis and V-axis. To enable true process-level verification, we audit fine-grained intermediate states rather than just final answers, and quantify efficiency via an overthinking metric relative to human trajectories. Experimental results show the best model, Gemini3-pro, achieves 56.3% overall accuracy, which falls significantly to 23.0% on Level-3 tasks, underscoring the difficulty of real-world multimodal agentic problem solving.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03016</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<title>The Geometric Alignment Tax: Tokenization vs. Continuous Geometry in Scientific Foundation Models</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04155</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04155.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Prashant C. Raju&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 3&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Foundation models for biology and physics optimize predictive accuracy, but their internal representations systematically fail to preserve the continuous geometry of the systems they model. We identify the root cause: the Geometric Alignment Tax, an intrinsic cost of forcing continuous manifolds through discrete categorical bottlenecks. Controlled ablations on synthetic dynamical systems demonstrate that replacing cross-entropy with a continuous head on an identical encoder reduces geometric distortion by up to 8.5x, while learned codebooks exhibit a non-monotonic double bind where finer quantization worsens geometry despite improving reconstruction. Under continuous objectives, three architectures differ by 1.3x; under discrete tokenization, they diverge by 3,000x. Evaluating 14 biological foundation models with rate-distortion theory and MINE, we identify three failure regimes: Local-Global Decoupling, Representational Compression, and Geometric Vacuity. A controlled experiment confirms that Evo 2's reverse-complement robustness on real DNA reflects conserved sequence composition, not learned symmetry. No model achieves simultaneously low distortion, high mutual information, and global coherence.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04155</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Token Warping Helps MLLMs Look from Nearby Viewpoints</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02870</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.02870.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Phillip Y. Lee, Chanho Park, Mingue Park, Seungwoo Yoo, Juil Koo, Minhyuk Sung&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 22&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Can warping tokens, rather than pixels, help multimodal large language models (MLLMs) understand how a scene appears from a nearby viewpoint? While MLLMs perform well on visual reasoning, they remain fragile to viewpoint changes, as pixel-wise warping is highly sensitive to small depth errors and often introduces geometric distortions. Drawing on theories of mental imagery that posit part-level structural representations as the basis for human perspective transformation, we examine whether image tokens in ViT-based MLLMs serve as an effective substrate for viewpoint changes. We compare forward and backward warping, finding that backward token warping, which defines a dense grid on the target view and retrieves a corresponding source-view token for each grid point, achieves greater stability and better preserves semantic coherence under viewpoint shifts. Experiments on our proposed ViewBench benchmark demonstrate that token-level warping enables MLLMs to reason reliably from nearby viewpoints, consistently outperforming all baselines including pixel-wise warping approaches, spatially fine-tuned MLLMs, and a generative warping method.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02870</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<title>Can LLMs Learn to Reason Robustly under Noisy Supervision?</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03993</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03993.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Shenzhi Yang, Guangcheng Zhu, Bowen Song, Sharon Li, Haobo Wang, Xing Zheng, Yingfan Ma, Zhongqi Chen, Weiqiang Wang, Gang Chen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 9&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) effectively trains reasoning models that rely on abundant perfect labels, but its vulnerability to unavoidable noisy labels due to expert scarcity remains critically underexplored. In this work, we take the first step toward a systematic analysis of noisy label mechanisms in RLVR. In contrast to supervised classification, most RLVR algorithms incorporate a rollout-based condition: a label's influence on training is contingent on whether the current policy can generate rollouts that realize it, a property that naturally extends to noisy labels. Based on this observation, we distinguish two types of noise: inactive noisy labels, which reduce data efficiency, and active noisy labels, which are reinforced and risk skewing the model toward incorrect distributions. From experiments on training with noisy samples, we identify an Early Correctness Coherence phenomenon: although noisy samples begin to lag behind in later stages, accuracy on both clean and noisy samples increases similarly in early training. Motivated by this dynamic, we propose Online Label Refinement (OLR), which progressively corrects potentially noisy labels with majority-voted answers when two conditions hold: a positive slope in the majority answer's rollout pass rate and stable historical consistency across updates, enabling gradual self-correction as the policy improves. We evaluate OLR on six in-distribution mathematical reasoning benchmarks (AIME24/25, AMC, MATH-500, Minerva, and Olympiad) and three out-of-distribution tasks (ARC-c, GPQA-diamond, and MMLU-pro). Across noise ratios from 0.1 to 0.9, OLR consistently improves robustness under both inactive and active noisy-label settings, achieving average gains of 3.6% to 3.9% on in-distribution benchmarks and 3.3% to 4.6% on out-of-distribution evaluations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03993</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Self-Distilled RLVR</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03128</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.03128.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Chenxu Yang, Chuanyu Qin, Qingyi Si, Minghui Chen, Naibin Gu, Dingyu Yao, Zheng Lin, Weiping Wang, Jiaqi Wang, Nan Duan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 79&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; On-policy distillation (OPD) has become a popular training paradigm in the LLM community. This paradigm selects a larger model as the teacher to provide dense, fine-grained signals for each sampled trajectory, in contrast to reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), which only obtains sparse signals from verifiable outcomes in the environment. Recently, the community has explored on-policy self-distillation (OPSD), where the same model serves as both teacher and student, with the teacher receiving additional privileged information such as reference answers to enable self-evolution. This paper demonstrates that learning signals solely derived from the privileged teacher result in severe information leakage and unstable long-term training. Accordingly, we identify the optimal niche for self-distillation and propose RLSD (RLVR with Self-Distillation). Specifically, we leverage self-distillation to obtain token-level policy differences for determining fine-grained update magnitudes, while continuing to use RLVR to derive reliable update directions from environmental feedback (e.g., response correctness). This enables RLSD to simultaneously harness the strengths of both RLVR and OPSD, achieving a higher convergence ceiling and superior training stability.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03128</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<title>ClawArena: Benchmarking AI Agents in Evolving Information Environments</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04202</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04202.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Haonian Ji, Kaiwen Xiong, Siwei Han, Peng Xia, Shi Qiu, Yiyang Zhou, Jiaqi Liu, Jinlong Li, Bingzhou Li, Zeyu Zheng, Cihang Xie, Huaxiu Yao&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 26&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; AI agents deployed as persistent assistants must maintain correct beliefs as their information environment evolves. In practice, evidence is scattered across heterogeneous sources that often contradict one another, new information can invalidate earlier conclusions, and user preferences surface through corrections rather than explicit instructions. Existing benchmarks largely assume static, single-authority settings and do not evaluate whether agents can keep up with this complexity. We introduce ClawArena, a benchmark for evaluating AI agents in evolving information environments. Each scenario maintains a complete hidden ground truth while exposing the agent only to noisy, partial, and sometimes contradictory traces across multi-channel sessions, workspace files, and staged updates. Evaluation is organized around three coupled challenges: multi-source conflict reasoning, dynamic belief revision, and implicit personalization, whose interactions yield a 14-category question taxonomy. Two question formats, multi-choice (set-selection) and shell-based executable checks, test both reasoning and workspace grounding. The current release contains 64 scenarios across 8 professional domains, totaling 1{,}879 evaluation rounds and 365 dynamic updates. Experiments on five agent frameworks and five language models show that both model capability (15.4% range) and framework design (9.2%) substantially affect performance, that self-evolving skill frameworks can partially close model-capability gaps, and that belief revision difficulty is determined by update design strategy rather than the mere presence of updates. Code is available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/ClawArena.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04202</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AURA: Always-On Understanding and Real-Time Assistance via Video Streams</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04184</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04184.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Xudong Lu, Yang Bo, Jinpeng Chen, Shuhan Li, Xintong Guo, Huankang Guan, Fang Liu, Dunyuan Xu, Peiwen Sun, Heyang Sun, Rui Liu, Hongsheng Li&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 37&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Video Large Language Models (VideoLLMs) have achieved strong performance on many video understanding tasks, but most existing systems remain offline and are not well-suited for live video streams that require continuous observation and timely response. Recent streaming VideoLLMs have made progress, yet current approaches often rely on decoupled trigger-response pipelines or are limited to captioning-style narration, reducing their effectiveness for open-ended question answering and long-horizon interaction. We propose AURA (Always-On Understanding and Real-Time Assistance), an end-to-end streaming visual interaction framework that enables a unified VideoLLM to continuously process video streams and support both real-time question answering and proactive responses. AURA integrates context management, data construction, training objectives, and deployment optimization for stable long-horizon streaming interaction. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on streaming benchmarks and supports a real-time demo system with ASR and TTS running at 2 FPS on two 80G accelerators. We release the AURA model together with a real-time inference framework to facilitate future research.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04184</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cog-DRIFT: Exploration on Adaptively Reformulated Instances Enables Learning from Hard Reasoning Problems</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04767</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04767.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Justin Chih-Yao Chen, Archiki Prasad, Zaid Khan, Joykirat Singh, Runchu Tian, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) has improved the reasoning abilities of LLMs, yet a fundamental limitation remains: models cannot learn from problems that are too difficult to solve under their current policy, as these yield no meaningful reward signal. We propose a simple yet effective solution based on task reformulation. We transform challenging open-ended problems into cognitively simpler variants -- such as multiple-choice and cloze formats -- that preserve the original answer while reducing the effective search space and providing denser learning signals. These reformulations span a spectrum from discriminative to generative tasks, which we exploit to bootstrap learning: models first learn from structured, easier formats, and this knowledge transfers back to improve performance on the original open-ended problems. Building on this insight, we introduce Cog-DRIFT, a framework that constructs reformulated variants and organizes them into an adaptive curriculum based on difficulty. Training progresses from easier to harder formats, enabling the model to learn from problems that previously yielded zero signal under standard RL post-training. Cog-DRIFT not only improves on the originally unsolvable hard problems (absolute +10.11% for Qwen and +8.64% for Llama) but also generalizes well to other held-out datasets. Across 2 models and 6 reasoning benchmarks, our method consistently outperforms standard GRPO and strong guided-exploration baselines. On average, Cog-DRIFT shows +4.72% (Qwen) and +3.23% (Llama) improvements over the second-best baseline. We further show that Cog-DRIFT improves pass@k at test time, and the curriculum improves sample efficiency. Overall, our results highlight task reformulation and curriculum learning as an effective paradigm for overcoming the exploration barrier in LLM post-training.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04767</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Paper Espresso: From Paper Overload to Research Insight</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04562</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04562.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Mingzhe Du, Luu Anh Tuan, Dong Huang, See-kiong Ng&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; The accelerating pace of scientific publishing makes it increasingly difficult for researchers to stay current. We present Paper Espresso, an open-source platform that automatically discovers, summarizes, and analyzes trending arXiv papers. The system uses large language models (LLMs) to generate structured summaries with topical labels and keywords, and provides multi-granularity trend analysis at daily, weekly, and monthly scales through LLM-driven topic consolidation. Over 35 months of continuous deployment, Paper Espresso has processed over 13,300 papers and publicly released all structured metadata, revealing rich dynamics in the AI research landscape: a mid-2025 surge in reinforcement learning for LLM reasoning, non-saturating topic emergence (6,673 unique topics), and a positive correlation between topic novelty and community engagement (2.0x median upvotes for the most novel papers). A live demo is available at https://huggingface.co/spaces/Elfsong/Paper_Espresso.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04562</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>HDP: A Lightweight Cryptographic Protocol for Human Delegation Provenance in Agentic AI Systems</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04522</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04522.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Asiri Dalugoda&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 4&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Agentic AI systems increasingly execute consequential actions on behalf of human principals, delegating tasks through multi-step chains of autonomous agents. No existing standard addresses a fundamental accountability gap: verifying that terminal actions in a delegation chain were genuinely authorized by a human principal, through what chain of delegation, and under what scope. This paper presents the Human Delegation Provenance (HDP) protocol, a lightweight token-based scheme that cryptographically captures and verifies human authorization context in multi-agent systems. An HDP token binds a human authorization event to a session, records each agent's delegation action as a signed hop in an append-only chain, and enables any participant to verify the full provenance record using only the issuer's Ed25519 public key and the current session identifier. Verification is fully offline, requiring no registry lookups or third-party trust anchors. We situate HDP within the existing landscape of delegation protocols, identify its distinct design point relative to OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange (RFC 8693), JSON Web Tokens (RFC 7519), UCAN, and the Intent Provenance Protocol (draft-haberkamp-ipp-00), and demonstrate that existing standards fail to address the multi-hop, append-only, human-provenance requirements of agentic systems. HDP has been published as an IETF Internet-Draft (draft-helixar-hdp-agentic-delegation-00) and a reference TypeScript SDK is publicly available.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04522</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Synthetic Sandbox for Training Machine Learning Engineering Agents</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04872</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04872.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Yuhang Zhou, Lizhu Zhang, Yifan Wu, Jiayi Liu, Xiangjun Fan, Zhuokai Zhao, Hong Yan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 4&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; As large language model agents advance beyond software engineering (SWE) tasks toward machine learning engineering (MLE), verifying agent behavior becomes orders of magnitude more expensive: while SWE tasks can be verified via fast-executing unit tests, MLE verification requires running full ML pipelines -- data preprocessing, model training, and metric evaluation -- on large datasets at each rollout step, rendering trajectory-wise on-policy reinforcement learning (RL) prohibitively slow. Existing approaches retreat to supervised fine-tuning (SFT) or offline proxy rewards, sacrificing the exploration and generalization benefits of on-policy RL. We observe that sandbox data size is the primary source of this bottleneck. Based on this insight, we introduce SandMLE, a multi-agent framework that generates diverse, verifiable synthetic MLE environments from a small number of seed tasks, preserving the structural and technical complexity of real-world problems while constraining datasets to micro-scale (each task is paired with only 50-200 training samples). Through extensive experiments, we show that SandMLE reduces execution time by over 13 times, enabling large-scale, on-policy trajectory-wise RL for the first time in the MLE domain. On MLE-bench-lite, SandMLE yields significant gains over SFT baselines across Qwen3-8B, 14B, and 30B-A3B, with relative medal rate improvements ranging from 20.3% to 66.9%. Furthermore, the trained policy generalizes across unseen agentic scaffolds, achieving up to 32.4% better HumanRank score on MLE-Dojo.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04872</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>AvatarPointillist: AutoRegressive 4D Gaussian Avatarization</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04787</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04787.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Hongyu Liu, Xuan Wang, Yating Wang, Zijian Wu, Ziyu Wan, Yue Ma, Runtao Liu, Boyao Zhou, Yujun Shen, Qifeng Chen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 5&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; We introduce AvatarPointillist, a novel framework for generating dynamic 4D Gaussian avatars from a single portrait image. At the core of our method is a decoder-only Transformer that autoregressively generates a point cloud for 3D Gaussian Splatting. This sequential approach allows for precise, adaptive construction, dynamically adjusting point density and the total number of points based on the subject's complexity. During point generation, the AR model also jointly predicts per-point binding information, enabling realistic animation. After generation, a dedicated Gaussian decoder converts the points into complete, renderable Gaussian attributes. We demonstrate that conditioning the decoder on the latent features from the AR generator enables effective interaction between stages and markedly improves fidelity. Extensive experiments validate that AvatarPointillist produces high-quality, photorealistic, and controllable avatars. We believe this autoregressive formulation represents a new paradigm for avatar generation, and we will release our code inspire future research.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04787</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CLEAR: Unlocking Generative Potential for Degraded Image Understanding in Unified Multimodal Models</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04780</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04780.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Xiangzhao Hao, Zefeng Zhang, Zhenyu Zhang, Linhao Yu, Yao Chen, Yiqian Zhang, Haiyun Guo, Shuohuan Wang, Yu Sun&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 5&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Image degradation from blur, noise, compression, and poor illumination severely undermines multimodal understanding in real-world settings. Unified multimodal models that combine understanding and generation within a single architecture are a natural fit for this challenge, as their generative pathway can model the fine-grained visual structure that degradation destroys. Yet these models fail to leverage their own generative capacity on degraded inputs. We trace this disconnect to two compounding factors: existing training regimes never ask the model to invoke generation during reasoning, and the standard decode-reencode pathway does not support effective joint optimization. We present CLEAR, a framework that connects the two capabilities through three progressive steps: (1) supervised fine-tuning on a degradation-aware dataset to establish the generate-then-answer reasoning pattern; (2) a Latent Representation Bridge that replaces the decode-reencode detour with a direct, optimizable connection between generation and reasoning; (3) Interleaved GRPO, a reinforcement learning method that jointly optimizes text reasoning and visual generation under answer-correctness rewards. We construct MMD-Bench, covering three degradation severity levels across six standard multimodal benchmarks. Experiments show that CLEAR substantially improves robustness on degraded inputs while preserving clean-image performance. Our analysis further reveals that removing pixel-level reconstruction supervision leads to intermediate visual states with higher perceptual quality, suggesting that task-driven optimization and visual quality are naturally aligned.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04780</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Less Detail, Better Answers: Degradation-Driven Prompting for VQA</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04838</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04838.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Haoxuan Han, Weijie Wang, Zeyu Zhang, Yefei He, Bohan Zhuang&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 7&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have significantly pushed the boundaries of Visual Question Answering (VQA).However,high-resolution details can sometimes become noise that leads to hallucinations or reasoning errors. In this paper,we propose Degradation-Driven Prompting (DDP), a novel framework that improves VQA performance by strategically reducing image fidelity to force models to focus on essential structural information. We evaluate DDP across two distinct tasks. Physical attributes targets images prone to human misjudgment, where DDP employs a combination of 80p downsampling, structural visual aids (white background masks and orthometric lines), and In-Context Learning (ICL) to calibrate the model's focus. Perceptual phenomena addresses various machine-susceptible visual anomalies and illusions, including Visual Anomaly (VA), Color (CI), Motion(MI),Gestalt (GI), Geometric (GSI), and Visual Illusions (VI).For this task, DDP integrates a task-classification stage with specialized tools such as blur masks and contrast enhancement alongside downsampling. Our experimental results demonstrate that less is more: by intentionally degrading visual inputs and providing targeted structural prompts, DDP enables VLMs to bypass distracting textures and achieve superior reasoning accuracy on challenging visual benchmarks.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04838</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Memory Intelligence Agent</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04503</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04503.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Jingyang Qiao, Weicheng Meng, Yu Cheng, Zhihang Lin, Zhizhong Zhang, Xin Tan, Jingyu Gong, Kun Shao, Yuan Xie&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 7&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Deep research agents (DRAs) integrate LLM reasoning with external tools. Memory systems enable DRAs to leverage historical experiences, which are essential for efficient reasoning and autonomous evolution. Existing methods rely on retrieving similar trajectories from memory to aid reasoning, while suffering from key limitations of ineffective memory evolution and increasing storage and retrieval costs. To address these problems, we propose a novel Memory Intelligence Agent (MIA) framework, consisting of a Manager-Planner-Executor architecture. Memory Manager is a non-parametric memory system that can store compressed historical search trajectories. Planner is a parametric memory agent that can produce search plans for questions. Executor is another agent that can search and analyze information guided by the search plan. To build the MIA framework, we first adopt an alternating reinforcement learning paradigm to enhance cooperation between the Planner and the Executor. Furthermore, we enable the Planner to continuously evolve during test-time learning, with updates performed on-the-fly alongside inference without interrupting the reasoning process. Additionally, we establish a bidirectional conversion loop between parametric and non-parametric memories to achieve efficient memory evolution. Finally, we incorporate a reflection and an unsupervised judgment mechanisms to boost reasoning and self-evolution in the open world. Extensive experiments across eleven benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of MIA.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04503</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Your Agent, Their Asset: A Real-World Safety Analysis of OpenClaw</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04759</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04759.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Zijun Wang, Haoqin Tu, Letian Zhang, Hardy Chen, Juncheng Wu, Xiangyan Liu, Zhenlong Yuan, Tianyu Pang, Michael Qizhe Shieh, Fengze Liu, Zeyu Zheng, Huaxiu Yao, Yuyin Zhou, Cihang Xie&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 13&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; OpenClaw, the most widely deployed personal AI agent in early 2026, operates with full local system access and integrates with sensitive services such as Gmail, Stripe, and the filesystem. While these broad privileges enable high levels of automation and powerful personalization, they also expose a substantial attack surface that existing sandboxed evaluations fail to capture. To address this gap, we present the first real-world safety evaluation of OpenClaw and introduce the CIK taxonomy, which unifies an agent's persistent state into three dimensions, i.e., Capability, Identity, and Knowledge, for safety analysis. Our evaluations cover 12 attack scenarios on a live OpenClaw instance across four backbone models (Claude Sonnet 4.5, Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and GPT-5.4). The results show that poisoning any single CIK dimension increases the average attack success rate from 24.6% to 64-74%, with even the most robust model exhibiting more than a threefold increase over its baseline vulnerability. We further assess three CIK-aligned defense strategies alongside a file-protection mechanism; however, the strongest defense still yields a 63.8% success rate under Capability-targeted attacks, while file protection blocks 97% of malicious injections but also prevents legitimate updates. Taken together, these findings show that the vulnerabilities are inherent to the agent architecture, necessitating more systematic safeguards to secure personal AI agents. Our project page is https://ucsc-vlaa.github.io/CIK-Bench.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04759</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Vero: An Open RL Recipe for General Visual Reasoning</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04917</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04917.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Gabriel Sarch, Linrong Cai, Qunzhong Wang, Haoyang Wu, Danqi Chen, Zhuang Liu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 17&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; What does it take to build a visual reasoner that works across charts, science, spatial understanding, and open-ended tasks? The strongest vision-language models (VLMs) show such broad visual reasoning is within reach, but the recipe behind them remains unclear, locked behind proprietary reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines with non-public data. We introduce Vero, a family of fully open VLMs that matches or exceeds existing open-weight models across diverse visual reasoning tasks. We scale RL data and rewards across six broad task categories, constructing Vero-600K, a 600K-sample dataset from 59 datasets, and designing task-routed rewards that handle heterogeneous answer formats. Vero achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving over four base models by 3.7-5.5 points on average across VeroEval, our suite of 30 challenging benchmarks. Starting from Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, Vero outperforms Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking on 23 of 30 benchmarks without additional proprietary thinking data. When trained from the same base model, Vero-600K exceeds existing RL datasets across task categories. Systematic ablations reveal that different task categories elicit qualitatively distinct reasoning patterns that transfer poorly in isolation, suggesting that broad data coverage is the primary driver of strong RL scaling. All data, code, and models are released.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04917</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>SkillX: Automatically Constructing Skill Knowledge Bases for Agents</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04804</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04804.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Chenxi Wang, Zhuoyun Yu, Xin Xie, Wuguannan Yao, Runnan Fang, Shuofei Qiao, Kexin Cao, Guozhou Zheng, Xiang Qi, Peng Zhang, Shumin Deng&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 19&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Learning from experience is critical for building capable large language model (LLM) agents, yet prevailing self-evolving paradigms remain inefficient: agents learn in isolation, repeatedly rediscover similar behaviors from limited experience, resulting in redundant exploration and poor generalization. To address this problem, we propose SkillX, a fully automated framework for constructing a plug-and-play skill knowledge base that can be reused across agents and environments. SkillX operates through a fully automated pipeline built on three synergistic innovations: (i) Multi-Level Skills Design, which distills raw trajectories into three-tiered hierarchy of strategic plans, functional skills, and atomic skills; (ii) Iterative Skills Refinement, which automatically revises skills based on execution feedback to continuously improve library quality; and (iii) Exploratory Skills Expansion, which proactively generates and validates novel skills to expand coverage beyond seed training data. Using a strong backbone agent (GLM-4.6), we automatically build a reusable skill library and evaluate its transferability on challenging long-horizon, user-interactive benchmarks, including AppWorld, BFCL-v3, and τ^2-Bench. Experiments show that SkillKB consistently improves task success and execution efficiency when plugged into weaker base agents, highlighting the importance of structured, hierarchical experience representations for generalizable agent learning. Our code will be publicly available soon at https://github.com/zjunlp/SkillX.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04804</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FileGram: Grounding Agent Personalization in File-System Behavioral Traces</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04901</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04901.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Shuai Liu, Shulin Tian, Kairui Hu, Yuhao Dong, Zhe Yang, Bo Li, Jingkang Yang, Chen Change Loy, Ziwei Liu&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 25&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Coworking AI agents operating within local file systems are rapidly emerging as a paradigm in human-AI interaction; however, effective personalization remains limited by severe data constraints, as strict privacy barriers and the difficulty of jointly collecting multimodal real-world traces prevent scalable training and evaluation, and existing methods remain interaction-centric while overlooking dense behavioral traces in file-system operations; to address this gap, we propose FileGram, a comprehensive framework that grounds agent memory and personalization in file-system behavioral traces, comprising three core components: (1) FileGramEngine, a scalable persona-driven data engine that simulates realistic workflows and generates fine-grained multimodal action sequences at scale; (2) FileGramBench, a diagnostic benchmark grounded in file-system behavioral traces for evaluating memory systems on profile reconstruction, trace disentanglement, persona drift detection, and multimodal grounding; and (3) FileGramOS, a bottom-up memory architecture that builds user profiles directly from atomic actions and content deltas rather than dialogue summaries, encoding these traces into procedural, semantic, and episodic channels with query-time abstraction; extensive experiments show that FileGramBench remains challenging for state-of-the-art memory systems and that FileGramEngine and FileGramOS are effective, and by open-sourcing the framework, we hope to support future research on personalized memory-centric file-system agents.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04901</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>SpatialEdit: Benchmarking Fine-Grained Image Spatial Editing</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04911</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04911.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Yicheng Xiao, Wenhu Zhang, Lin Song, Yukang Chen, Wenbo Li, Nan Jiang, Tianhe Ren, Haokun Lin, Wei Huang, Haoyang Huang, Xiu Li, Nan Duan, Xiaojuan Qi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 26&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Image spatial editing performs geometry-driven transformations, allowing precise control over object layout and camera viewpoints. Current models are insufficient for fine-grained spatial manipulations, motivating a dedicated assessment suite. Our contributions are listed: (i) We introduce SpatialEdit-Bench, a complete benchmark that evaluates spatial editing by jointly measuring perceptual plausibility and geometric fidelity via viewpoint reconstruction and framing analysis. (ii) To address the data bottleneck for scalable training, we construct SpatialEdit-500k, a synthetic dataset generated with a controllable Blender pipeline that renders objects across diverse backgrounds and systematic camera trajectories, providing precise ground-truth transformations for both object- and camera-centric operations. (iii) Building on this data, we develop SpatialEdit-16B, a baseline model for fine-grained spatial editing. Our method achieves competitive performance on general editing while substantially outperforming prior methods on spatial manipulation tasks. All resources will be made public at https://github.com/EasonXiao-888/SpatialEdit.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04911</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>TriAttention: Efficient Long Reasoning with Trigonometric KV Compression</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04921</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04921.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Weian Mao, Xi Lin, Wei Huang, Yuxin Xie, Tianfu Fu, Bohan Zhuang, Song Han, Yukang Chen&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 64&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Extended reasoning in large language models (LLMs) creates severe KV cache memory bottlenecks. Leading KV cache compression methods estimate KV importance using attention scores from recent post-RoPE queries. However, queries rotate with position during RoPE, making representative queries very few, leading to poor top-key selection and unstable reasoning. To avoid this issue, we turn to the pre-RoPE space, where we observe that Q and K vectors are highly concentrated around fixed non-zero centers and remain stable across positions -- Q/K concentration. We show that this concentration causes queries to preferentially attend to keys at specific distances (e.g., nearest keys), with the centers determining which distances are preferred via a trigonometric series. Based on this, we propose TriAttention to estimate key importance by leveraging these centers. Via the trigonometric series, we use the distance preference characterized by these centers to score keys according to their positions, and also leverage Q/K norms as an additional signal for importance estimation. On AIME25 with 32K-token generation, TriAttention matches Full Attention reasoning accuracy while achieving 2.5x higher throughput or 10.7x KV memory reduction, whereas leading baselines achieve only about half the accuracy at the same efficiency. TriAttention enables OpenClaw deployment on a single consumer GPU, where long context would otherwise cause out-of-memory with Full Attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04921</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MinerU2.5-Pro: Pushing the Limits of Data-Centric Document Parsing at Scale</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04771</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04771.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; Bin Wang, Tianyao He, Linke Ouyang, Fan Wu, Zhiyuan Zhao, Tao Chu, Yuan Qu, Zhenjiang Jin, Weijun Zeng, Ziyang Miao, Bangrui Xu, Junbo Niu, Mengzhang Cai, Jiantao Qiu, Qintong Zhang, Dongsheng Ma, Yuefeng Sun, Hejun Dong, Wenzheng Zhang, Jutao Xiao, Jiayong Shi, Pengyu Liao, Xiaomeng Zhao, Huaping Zhong, Liqun Wei, Jing Yu, Jie Yang, Wei Li, Shasha Wang, Qianqian Wu, Xuanhe Zhou, Weijia Li, Zhenxiang Li, Zhongying Tu, Jiang Wu, Lijun Wu, Chao Xu, Kai Chen, Wentao Zhang, Yu Qiao, Bowen Zhou, Dahua Lin, Conghui He&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 89&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Current document parsing methods compete primarily on model architecture innovation, while systematic engineering of training data remains underexplored. Yet SOTA models of different architectures and parameter scales exhibit highly consistent failure patterns on the same set of hard samples, suggesting that the performance bottleneck stems from shared deficiencies in training data rather than architecture itself. Building on this finding, we present \minerupro, which advances the state of the art solely through data engineering and training strategy optimization while keeping the 1.2B-parameter architecture of \mineru completely fixed. At its core is a Data Engine co-designed around coverage, informativeness, and annotation accuracy: Diversity-and-Difficulty-Aware Sampling expands training data from under 10M to 65.5M samples while correcting distribution shift; Cross-Model Consistency Verification leverages output agreement among heterogeneous models to assess sample difficulty and generate reliable annotations; the Judge-and-Refine pipeline improves annotation quality for hard samples through render-then-verify iterative correction. A three-stage progressive training strategy -- large-scale pre-training, hard sample fine-tuning, and GRPO alignment -- sequentially exploits these data at different quality tiers. On the evaluation front, we fix element-matching biases in OmniDocBench~v1.5 and introduce a Hard subset, establishing the more discriminative OmniDocBench~v1.6 protocol. Without any architectural modification, \minerupro achieves 95.69 on OmniDocBench~v1.6, improving over the same-architecture baseline by 2.71 points and surpassing all existing methods including models with over 200times more parameters.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04771</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>OpenWorldLib: A Unified Codebase and Definition of Advanced World Models</title>
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04707</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2604.04707.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Authors:&lt;/b&gt; DataFlow Team, Bohan Zeng, Daili Hua, Kaixin Zhu, Yifan Dai, Bozhou Li, Yuran Wang, Chengzhuo Tong, Yifan Yang, Mingkun Chang, Jianbin Zhao, Zhou Liu, Hao Liang, Xiaochen Ma, Ruichuan An, Junbo Niu, Zimo Meng, Tianyi Bai, Meiyi Qiang, Huanyao Zhang, Zhiyou Xiao, Tianyu Guo, Qinhan Yu, Runhao Zhao, Zhengpin Li, Xinyi Huang, Yisheng Pan, Yiwen Tang, Yang Shi, Yue Ding, Xinlong Chen, Hongcheng Gao, Minglei Shi, Jialong Wu, Zekun Wang, Yuanxing Zhang, Xintao Wang, Pengfei Wan, Yiren Song, Mike Zheng Shou, Wentao Zhang&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Upvotes:&lt;/b&gt; 149&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; World models have garnered significant attention as a promising research direction in artificial intelligence, yet a clear and unified definition remains lacking. In this paper, we introduce OpenWorldLib, a comprehensive and standardized inference framework for Advanced World Models. Drawing on the evolution of world models, we propose a clear definition: a world model is a model or framework centered on perception, equipped with interaction and long-term memory capabilities, for understanding and predicting the complex world. We further systematically categorize the essential capabilities of world models. Based on this definition, OpenWorldLib integrates models across different tasks within a unified framework, enabling efficient reuse and collaborative inference. Finally, we present additional reflections and analyses on potential future directions for world model research. Code link: https://github.com/OpenDCAI/OpenWorldLib&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.04707</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>