bot: update RSS feed
This commit is contained in:
16
feed.xml
16
feed.xml
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
|||||||
<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
|
<docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
|
||||||
<generator>python-feedgen</generator>
|
<generator>python-feedgen</generator>
|
||||||
<language>en</language>
|
<language>en</language>
|
||||||
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2025 00:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
|
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 00:02:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
|
||||||
<item>
|
<item>
|
||||||
<title>Flow Equivariant Recurrent Neural Networks</title>
|
<title>Flow Equivariant Recurrent Neural Networks</title>
|
||||||
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14793</link>
|
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14793</link>
|
||||||
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
|
|||||||
<item>
|
<item>
|
||||||
<title>Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Models</title>
|
<title>Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Models</title>
|
||||||
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21509</link>
|
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21509</link>
|
||||||
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.21509.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Runjin Chen, Andy Arditi, Henry Sleight, Owain Evans, Jack Lindsey</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 14</p><p><b>Summary:</b> Large language models interact with users through a simulated 'Assistant' persona. While the Assistant is typically trained to be helpful, harmless, and honest, it sometimes deviates from these ideals. In this paper, we identify directions in the model's activation space-persona vectors-underlying several traits, such as evil, sycophancy, and propensity to hallucinate. We confirm that these vectors can be used to monitor fluctuations in the Assistant's personality at deployment time. We then apply persona vectors to predict and control personality shifts that occur during training. We find that both intended and unintended personality changes after finetuning are strongly correlated with shifts along the relevant persona vectors. These shifts can be mitigated through post-hoc intervention, or avoided in the first place with a new preventative steering method. Moreover, persona vectors can be used to flag training data that will produce undesirable personality changes, both at the dataset level and the individual sample level. Our method for extracting persona vectors is automated and can be applied to any personality trait of interest, given only a natural-language description.</p></description>
|
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.21509.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Runjin Chen, Andy Arditi, Henry Sleight, Owain Evans, Jack Lindsey</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 18</p><p><b>Summary:</b> Large language models interact with users through a simulated 'Assistant' persona. While the Assistant is typically trained to be helpful, harmless, and honest, it sometimes deviates from these ideals. In this paper, we identify directions in the model's activation space-persona vectors-underlying several traits, such as evil, sycophancy, and propensity to hallucinate. We confirm that these vectors can be used to monitor fluctuations in the Assistant's personality at deployment time. We then apply persona vectors to predict and control personality shifts that occur during training. We find that both intended and unintended personality changes after finetuning are strongly correlated with shifts along the relevant persona vectors. These shifts can be mitigated through post-hoc intervention, or avoided in the first place with a new preventative steering method. Moreover, persona vectors can be used to flag training data that will produce undesirable personality changes, both at the dataset level and the individual sample level. Our method for extracting persona vectors is automated and can be applied to any personality trait of interest, given only a natural-language description.</p></description>
|
||||||
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21509</guid>
|
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21509</guid>
|
||||||
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 05:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
|
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 05:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
|
||||||
</item>
|
</item>
|
||||||
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
|
|||||||
<item>
|
<item>
|
||||||
<title>RecGPT Technical Report</title>
|
<title>RecGPT Technical Report</title>
|
||||||
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22879</link>
|
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22879</link>
|
||||||
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.22879.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Chao Yi, Dian Chen, Gaoyang Guo, Jiakai Tang, Jian Wu, Jing Yu, Sunhao Dai, Wen Chen, Wenjun Yang, Yuning Jiang, Zhujin Gao, Bo Zheng, Chi Li, Dimin Wang, Dixuan Wang, Fan Li, Fan Zhang, Haibin Chen, Haozhuang Liu, Jialin Zhu, Jiamang Wang, Jiawei Wu, Jin Cui, Ju Huang, Kai Zhang, Kan Liu, Lang Tian, Liang Rao, Longbin Li, Lulu Zhao, Mao Zhang, Na He, Peiyang Wang, Qiqi Huang, Tao Luo, Wenbo Su, Xiaoxiao He, Xin Tong, Xu Chen, Xunke Xi, Yang Li, Yaxuan Wu, Yeqiu Yang, Yi Hu, Yinnan Song, Yuchen Li, Yujie Luo, Yujin Yuan, Yuliang Yan, Zhengyang Wang, Zhibo Xiao, Zhixin Ma, Zile Zhou</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 19</p><p><b>Summary:</b> Recommender systems are among the most impactful applications of artificial intelligence, serving as critical infrastructure connecting users, merchants, and platforms. However, most current industrial systems remain heavily reliant on historical co-occurrence patterns and log-fitting objectives, i.e., optimizing for past user interactions without explicitly modeling user intent. This log-fitting approach often leads to overfitting to narrow historical preferences, failing to capture users' evolving and latent interests. As a result, it reinforces filter bubbles and long-tail phenomena, ultimately harming user experience and threatening the sustainability of the whole recommendation ecosystem. To address these challenges, we rethink the overall design paradigm of recommender systems and propose RecGPT, a next-generation framework that places user intent at the center of the recommendation pipeline. By integrating large language models (LLMs) into key stages of user interest mining, item retrieval, and explanation generation, RecGPT transforms log-fitting recommendation into an intent-centric process. To effectively align general-purpose LLMs to the above domain-specific recommendation tasks at scale, RecGPT incorporates a multi-stage training paradigm, which integrates reasoning-enhanced pre-alignment and self-training evolution, guided by a Human-LLM cooperative judge system. Currently, RecGPT has been fully deployed on the Taobao App. Online experiments demonstrate that RecGPT achieves consistent performance gains across stakeholders: users benefit from increased content diversity and satisfaction, merchants and the platform gain greater exposure and conversions. These comprehensive improvement results across all stakeholders validates that LLM-driven, intent-centric design can foster a more sustainable and mutually beneficial recommendation ecosystem.</p></description>
|
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.22879.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Chao Yi, Dian Chen, Gaoyang Guo, Jiakai Tang, Jian Wu, Jing Yu, Sunhao Dai, Wen Chen, Wenjun Yang, Yuning Jiang, Zhujin Gao, Bo Zheng, Chi Li, Dimin Wang, Dixuan Wang, Fan Li, Fan Zhang, Haibin Chen, Haozhuang Liu, Jialin Zhu, Jiamang Wang, Jiawei Wu, Jin Cui, Ju Huang, Kai Zhang, Kan Liu, Lang Tian, Liang Rao, Longbin Li, Lulu Zhao, Mao Zhang, Na He, Peiyang Wang, Qiqi Huang, Tao Luo, Wenbo Su, Xiaoxiao He, Xin Tong, Xu Chen, Xunke Xi, Yang Li, Yaxuan Wu, Yeqiu Yang, Yi Hu, Yinnan Song, Yuchen Li, Yujie Luo, Yujin Yuan, Yuliang Yan, Zhengyang Wang, Zhibo Xiao, Zhixin Ma, Zile Zhou</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 23</p><p><b>Summary:</b> Recommender systems are among the most impactful applications of artificial intelligence, serving as critical infrastructure connecting users, merchants, and platforms. However, most current industrial systems remain heavily reliant on historical co-occurrence patterns and log-fitting objectives, i.e., optimizing for past user interactions without explicitly modeling user intent. This log-fitting approach often leads to overfitting to narrow historical preferences, failing to capture users' evolving and latent interests. As a result, it reinforces filter bubbles and long-tail phenomena, ultimately harming user experience and threatening the sustainability of the whole recommendation ecosystem. To address these challenges, we rethink the overall design paradigm of recommender systems and propose RecGPT, a next-generation framework that places user intent at the center of the recommendation pipeline. By integrating large language models (LLMs) into key stages of user interest mining, item retrieval, and explanation generation, RecGPT transforms log-fitting recommendation into an intent-centric process. To effectively align general-purpose LLMs to the above domain-specific recommendation tasks at scale, RecGPT incorporates a multi-stage training paradigm, which integrates reasoning-enhanced pre-alignment and self-training evolution, guided by a Human-LLM cooperative judge system. Currently, RecGPT has been fully deployed on the Taobao App. Online experiments demonstrate that RecGPT achieves consistent performance gains across stakeholders: users benefit from increased content diversity and satisfaction, merchants and the platform gain greater exposure and conversions. These comprehensive improvement results across all stakeholders validates that LLM-driven, intent-centric design can foster a more sustainable and mutually beneficial recommendation ecosystem.</p></description>
|
||||||
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22879</guid>
|
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22879</guid>
|
||||||
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
|
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
|
||||||
</item>
|
</item>
|
||||||
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
|
|||||||
<item>
|
<item>
|
||||||
<title>iLRM: An Iterative Large 3D Reconstruction Model</title>
|
<title>iLRM: An Iterative Large 3D Reconstruction Model</title>
|
||||||
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23277</link>
|
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23277</link>
|
||||||
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.23277.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Gyeongjin Kang, Seungtae Nam, Xiangyu Sun, Sameh Khamis, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Eunbyung Park</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 17</p><p><b>Summary:</b> Feed-forward 3D modeling has emerged as a promising approach for rapid and high-quality 3D reconstruction. In particular, directly generating explicit 3D representations, such as 3D Gaussian splatting, has attracted significant attention due to its fast and high-quality rendering, as well as numerous applications. However, many state-of-the-art methods, primarily based on transformer architectures, suffer from severe scalability issues because they rely on full attention across image tokens from multiple input views, resulting in prohibitive computational costs as the number of views or image resolution increases. Toward a scalable and efficient feed-forward 3D reconstruction, we introduce an iterative Large 3D Reconstruction Model (iLRM) that generates 3D Gaussian representations through an iterative refinement mechanism, guided by three core principles: (1) decoupling the scene representation from input-view images to enable compact 3D representations; (2) decomposing fully-attentional multi-view interactions into a two-stage attention scheme to reduce computational costs; and (3) injecting high-resolution information at every layer to achieve high-fidelity reconstruction. Experimental results on widely used datasets, such as RE10K and DL3DV, demonstrate that iLRM outperforms existing methods in both reconstruction quality and speed. Notably, iLRM exhibits superior scalability, delivering significantly higher reconstruction quality under comparable computational cost by efficiently leveraging a larger number of input views.</p></description>
|
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.23277.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Gyeongjin Kang, Seungtae Nam, Xiangyu Sun, Sameh Khamis, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Eunbyung Park</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 22</p><p><b>Summary:</b> Feed-forward 3D modeling has emerged as a promising approach for rapid and high-quality 3D reconstruction. In particular, directly generating explicit 3D representations, such as 3D Gaussian splatting, has attracted significant attention due to its fast and high-quality rendering, as well as numerous applications. However, many state-of-the-art methods, primarily based on transformer architectures, suffer from severe scalability issues because they rely on full attention across image tokens from multiple input views, resulting in prohibitive computational costs as the number of views or image resolution increases. Toward a scalable and efficient feed-forward 3D reconstruction, we introduce an iterative Large 3D Reconstruction Model (iLRM) that generates 3D Gaussian representations through an iterative refinement mechanism, guided by three core principles: (1) decoupling the scene representation from input-view images to enable compact 3D representations; (2) decomposing fully-attentional multi-view interactions into a two-stage attention scheme to reduce computational costs; and (3) injecting high-resolution information at every layer to achieve high-fidelity reconstruction. Experimental results on widely used datasets, such as RE10K and DL3DV, demonstrate that iLRM outperforms existing methods in both reconstruction quality and speed. Notably, iLRM exhibits superior scalability, delivering significantly higher reconstruction quality under comparable computational cost by efficiently leveraging a larger number of input views.</p></description>
|
||||||
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23277</guid>
|
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23277</guid>
|
||||||
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
|
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
|
||||||
</item>
|
</item>
|
||||||
@@ -88,14 +88,14 @@
|
|||||||
<item>
|
<item>
|
||||||
<title>On the Expressiveness of Softmax Attention: A Recurrent Neural Network Perspective</title>
|
<title>On the Expressiveness of Softmax Attention: A Recurrent Neural Network Perspective</title>
|
||||||
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23632</link>
|
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23632</link>
|
||||||
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.23632.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Gabriel Mongaras, Eric C. Larson</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 2</p><p><b>Summary:</b> Since its introduction, softmax attention has become the backbone of modern transformer architectures due to its expressiveness and scalability across a wide range of tasks. However, the main drawback of softmax attention is the quadratic memory requirement and computational complexity with respect to the sequence length. By replacing the softmax nonlinearity, linear attention and similar methods have been introduced to avoid the quadratic bottleneck of softmax attention. Despite these linear forms of attention being derived from the original softmax formulation, they typically lag in terms of downstream accuracy. While strong intuition of the softmax nonlinearity on the query and key inner product suggests that it has desirable properties compared to other nonlinearities, the question of why this discrepancy exists still remains unanswered. This work demonstrates that linear attention is an approximation of softmax attention by deriving the recurrent form of softmax attention. Using this form, each part of softmax attention can be described in the language of recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Describing softmax attention as an RNN allows for the ablation of the components of softmax attention to understand the importance of each part and how they interact. In this way, our work helps explain why softmax attention is more expressive than its counterparts.</p></description>
|
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.23632.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Gabriel Mongaras, Eric C. Larson</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 3</p><p><b>Summary:</b> Since its introduction, softmax attention has become the backbone of modern transformer architectures due to its expressiveness and scalability across a wide range of tasks. However, the main drawback of softmax attention is the quadratic memory requirement and computational complexity with respect to the sequence length. By replacing the softmax nonlinearity, linear attention and similar methods have been introduced to avoid the quadratic bottleneck of softmax attention. Despite these linear forms of attention being derived from the original softmax formulation, they typically lag in terms of downstream accuracy. While strong intuition of the softmax nonlinearity on the query and key inner product suggests that it has desirable properties compared to other nonlinearities, the question of why this discrepancy exists still remains unanswered. This work demonstrates that linear attention is an approximation of softmax attention by deriving the recurrent form of softmax attention. Using this form, each part of softmax attention can be described in the language of recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Describing softmax attention as an RNN allows for the ablation of the components of softmax attention to understand the importance of each part and how they interact. In this way, our work helps explain why softmax attention is more expressive than its counterparts.</p></description>
|
||||||
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23632</guid>
|
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23632</guid>
|
||||||
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
|
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
|
||||||
</item>
|
</item>
|
||||||
<item>
|
<item>
|
||||||
<title>villa-X: Enhancing Latent Action Modeling in Vision-Language-Action Models</title>
|
<title>villa-X: Enhancing Latent Action Modeling in Vision-Language-Action Models</title>
|
||||||
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23682</link>
|
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23682</link>
|
||||||
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.23682.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Xiaoyu Chen, Hangxing Wei, Pushi Zhang, Chuheng Zhang, Kaixin Wang, Yanjiang Guo, Rushuai Yang, Yucen Wang, Xinquan Xiao, Li Zhao, Jianyu Chen, Jiang Bian</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 18</p><p><b>Summary:</b> Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models have emerged as a popular paradigm for learning robot manipulation policies that can follow language instructions and generalize to novel scenarios. Recent work has begun to explore the incorporation of latent actions, an abstract representation of visual change between two frames, into VLA pre-training. In this paper, we introduce villa-X, a novel Visual-Language-Latent-Action (ViLLA) framework that advances latent action modeling for learning generalizable robot manipulation policies. Our approach improves both how latent actions are learned and how they are incorporated into VLA pre-training. Together, these contributions enable villa-X to achieve superior performance across simulated environments including SIMPLER and LIBERO, as well as on two real-world robot setups including gripper and dexterous hand manipulation. We believe the ViLLA paradigm holds significant promise, and that our villa-X provides a strong foundation for future research.</p></description>
|
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.23682.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Xiaoyu Chen, Hangxing Wei, Pushi Zhang, Chuheng Zhang, Kaixin Wang, Yanjiang Guo, Rushuai Yang, Yucen Wang, Xinquan Xiao, Li Zhao, Jianyu Chen, Jiang Bian</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 20</p><p><b>Summary:</b> Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models have emerged as a popular paradigm for learning robot manipulation policies that can follow language instructions and generalize to novel scenarios. Recent work has begun to explore the incorporation of latent actions, an abstract representation of visual change between two frames, into VLA pre-training. In this paper, we introduce villa-X, a novel Visual-Language-Latent-Action (ViLLA) framework that advances latent action modeling for learning generalizable robot manipulation policies. Our approach improves both how latent actions are learned and how they are incorporated into VLA pre-training. Together, these contributions enable villa-X to achieve superior performance across simulated environments including SIMPLER and LIBERO, as well as on two real-world robot setups including gripper and dexterous hand manipulation. We believe the ViLLA paradigm holds significant promise, and that our villa-X provides a strong foundation for future research.</p></description>
|
||||||
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23682</guid>
|
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23682</guid>
|
||||||
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
|
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 15:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
|
||||||
</item>
|
</item>
|
||||||
@@ -109,14 +109,14 @@
|
|||||||
<item>
|
<item>
|
||||||
<title>Seed-Prover: Deep and Broad Reasoning for Automated Theorem Proving</title>
|
<title>Seed-Prover: Deep and Broad Reasoning for Automated Theorem Proving</title>
|
||||||
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23726</link>
|
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23726</link>
|
||||||
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.23726.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Luoxin Chen, Jinming Gu, Liankai Huang, Wenhao Huang, Zhicheng Jiang, Allan Jie, Xiaoran Jin, Xing Jin, Chenggang Li, Kaijing Ma, Cheng Ren, Jiawei Shen, Wenlei Shi, Tong Sun, He Sun, Jiahui Wang, Siran Wang, Zhihong Wang, Chenrui Wei, Shufa Wei, Yonghui Wu, Yuchen Wu, Yihang Xia, Huajian Xin, Fan Yang, Huaiyuan Ying, Hongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Tianyang Zhan, Chi Zhang, Yue Zhang, Ge Zhang, Tianyun Zhao, Jianqiu Zhao, Yichi Zhou, Thomas Hanwen Zhu</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 78</p><p><b>Summary:</b> LLMs have demonstrated strong mathematical reasoning abilities by leveraging reinforcement learning with long chain-of-thought, yet they continue to struggle with theorem proving due to the lack of clear supervision signals when solely using natural language. Dedicated domain-specific languages like Lean provide clear supervision via formal verification of proofs, enabling effective training through reinforcement learning. In this work, we propose Seed-Prover, a lemma-style whole-proof reasoning model. Seed-Prover can iteratively refine its proof based on Lean feedback, proved lemmas, and self-summarization. To solve IMO-level contest problems, we design three test-time inference strategies that enable both deep and broad reasoning. Seed-Prover proves 78.1% of formalized past IMO problems, saturates MiniF2F, and achieves over 50\% on PutnamBench, outperforming the previous state-of-the-art by a large margin. To address the lack of geometry support in Lean, we introduce a geometry reasoning engine Seed-Geometry, which outperforms previous formal geometry engines. We use these two systems to participate in IMO 2025 and fully prove 5 out of 6 problems. This work represents a significant advancement in automated mathematical reasoning, demonstrating the effectiveness of formal verification with long chain-of-thought reasoning.</p></description>
|
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.23726.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Luoxin Chen, Jinming Gu, Liankai Huang, Wenhao Huang, Zhicheng Jiang, Allan Jie, Xiaoran Jin, Xing Jin, Chenggang Li, Kaijing Ma, Cheng Ren, Jiawei Shen, Wenlei Shi, Tong Sun, He Sun, Jiahui Wang, Siran Wang, Zhihong Wang, Chenrui Wei, Shufa Wei, Yonghui Wu, Yuchen Wu, Yihang Xia, Huajian Xin, Fan Yang, Huaiyuan Ying, Hongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Tianyang Zhan, Chi Zhang, Yue Zhang, Ge Zhang, Tianyun Zhao, Jianqiu Zhao, Yichi Zhou, Thomas Hanwen Zhu</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 86</p><p><b>Summary:</b> LLMs have demonstrated strong mathematical reasoning abilities by leveraging reinforcement learning with long chain-of-thought, yet they continue to struggle with theorem proving due to the lack of clear supervision signals when solely using natural language. Dedicated domain-specific languages like Lean provide clear supervision via formal verification of proofs, enabling effective training through reinforcement learning. In this work, we propose Seed-Prover, a lemma-style whole-proof reasoning model. Seed-Prover can iteratively refine its proof based on Lean feedback, proved lemmas, and self-summarization. To solve IMO-level contest problems, we design three test-time inference strategies that enable both deep and broad reasoning. Seed-Prover proves 78.1% of formalized past IMO problems, saturates MiniF2F, and achieves over 50\% on PutnamBench, outperforming the previous state-of-the-art by a large margin. To address the lack of geometry support in Lean, we introduce a geometry reasoning engine Seed-Geometry, which outperforms previous formal geometry engines. We use these two systems to participate in IMO 2025 and fully prove 5 out of 6 problems. This work represents a significant advancement in automated mathematical reasoning, demonstrating the effectiveness of formal verification with long chain-of-thought reasoning.</p></description>
|
||||||
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23726</guid>
|
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23726</guid>
|
||||||
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 17:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
|
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 17:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
|
||||||
</item>
|
</item>
|
||||||
<item>
|
<item>
|
||||||
<title>Phi-Ground Tech Report: Advancing Perception in GUI Grounding</title>
|
<title>Phi-Ground Tech Report: Advancing Perception in GUI Grounding</title>
|
||||||
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23779</link>
|
<link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23779</link>
|
||||||
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.23779.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Miaosen Zhang, Ziqiang Xu, Jialiang Zhu, Qi Dai, Kai Qiu, Yifan Yang, Chong Luo, Tianyi Chen, Justin Wagle, Tim Franklin, Baining Guo</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 34</p><p><b>Summary:</b> With the development of multimodal reasoning models, Computer Use Agents (CUAs), akin to Jarvis from "Iron Man", are becoming a reality. GUI grounding is a core component for CUAs to execute actual actions, similar to mechanical control in robotics, and it directly leads to the success or failure of the system. It determines actions such as clicking and typing, as well as related parameters like the coordinates for clicks. Current end-to-end grounding models still achieve less than 65\% accuracy on challenging benchmarks like ScreenSpot-pro and UI-Vision, indicating they are far from being ready for deployment. % , as a single misclick can result in unacceptable consequences. In this work, we conduct an empirical study on the training of grounding models, examining details from data collection to model training. Ultimately, we developed the Phi-Ground model family, which achieves state-of-the-art performance across all five grounding benchmarks for models under 10B parameters in agent settings. In the end-to-end model setting, our model still achieves SOTA results with scores of \textbf{43.2} on ScreenSpot-pro and \textbf{27.2} on UI-Vision. We believe that the various details discussed in this paper, along with our successes and failures, not only clarify the construction of grounding models but also benefit other perception tasks. Project homepage: https://zhangmiaosen2000.github.io/Phi-Ground/{https://zhangmiaosen2000.github.io/Phi-Ground/}</p></description>
|
<description><p><img src="https://cdn-thumbnails.huggingface.co/social-thumbnails/papers/2507.23779.png" alt="Paper thumbnail" style="max-width: 300px; height: auto;" /></p><p><b>Authors:</b> Miaosen Zhang, Ziqiang Xu, Jialiang Zhu, Qi Dai, Kai Qiu, Yifan Yang, Chong Luo, Tianyi Chen, Justin Wagle, Tim Franklin, Baining Guo</p><p><b>Upvotes:</b> 35</p><p><b>Summary:</b> With the development of multimodal reasoning models, Computer Use Agents (CUAs), akin to Jarvis from "Iron Man", are becoming a reality. GUI grounding is a core component for CUAs to execute actual actions, similar to mechanical control in robotics, and it directly leads to the success or failure of the system. It determines actions such as clicking and typing, as well as related parameters like the coordinates for clicks. Current end-to-end grounding models still achieve less than 65\% accuracy on challenging benchmarks like ScreenSpot-pro and UI-Vision, indicating they are far from being ready for deployment. % , as a single misclick can result in unacceptable consequences. In this work, we conduct an empirical study on the training of grounding models, examining details from data collection to model training. Ultimately, we developed the Phi-Ground model family, which achieves state-of-the-art performance across all five grounding benchmarks for models under 10B parameters in agent settings. In the end-to-end model setting, our model still achieves SOTA results with scores of \textbf{43.2} on ScreenSpot-pro and \textbf{27.2} on UI-Vision. We believe that the various details discussed in this paper, along with our successes and failures, not only clarify the construction of grounding models but also benefit other perception tasks. Project homepage: https://zhangmiaosen2000.github.io/Phi-Ground/{https://zhangmiaosen2000.github.io/Phi-Ground/}</p></description>
|
||||||
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23779</guid>
|
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23779</guid>
|
||||||
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 17:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
|
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 17:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
|
||||||
</item>
|
</item>
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user