Contact phone numbers with stray text in front of them, like
`abc+12312312321`, were saving successfully instead of being rejected as
invalid. Agents could end up with unusable numbers on a contact, and the
same values were persisted rather than discarded when captured through
the live chat widget.
## How to reproduce
1. Open a contact and edit its details.
2. Set the phone number to `abc+12312312321` via the API (`PATCH
/api/v1/accounts/:id/contacts/:id`).
3. Before this change the update succeeds. Now it fails validation.
## What changed
The E.164 format check was missing a leading `\A` anchor, so Rails
matched it anywhere in the string and accepted any prefix ahead of a
valid number. Both the validation and the `phone_number_format` fallback
used by `discard_invalid_attrs` are now anchored, so the widget path
discards these values instead of storing them.
Contacts already holding a prefixed number will now fail validation on
their next save. Worth a count on production first:
```sql
SELECT count(*) FROM contacts WHERE phone_number !~ '^\+[1-9][0-9]{1,14}$' AND phone_number <> '';
```
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
When the SDK sends identify calls with identical payloads (common on
every page load), `save!` fires even though no attributes changed. While
Rails skips the actual UPDATE SQL, it still opens a transaction, runs
all callbacks (including validation queries like `Contact Exists?`), and
triggers `after_commit` hooks — all for a no-op.
This adds a `changed?` guard before `save!` to skip it entirely when no
attributes have actually changed.
**How to test**
- Trigger an identify call via the SDK with a contact's existing
attributes (same name, email, custom_attributes, etc.)
- The contact should not fire a save (no transaction, no callbacks)
- Trigger an identify call with a changed attribute — save should work
normally
**What changed**
- `ContactIdentifyAction#update_contact`: guard `save!` with `changed?`
check
- Added specs to verify `save!` is skipped for unchanged params and
avatar job still enqueues independently
While debugging a sentry error for "ActiveRecord::InvalidForeignKey ActiveStorage::Representations::RedirectController", it was noticed that we enqueue a Avatar::AvatarFromUrlJob for each setUser call, which is unnecessary. Hence making this call only if the contact doesn't have an existing avatar.
If one needs to have this avatar updated, they can go to the contacts tab and delete the current avatar, Chatwoot will pick up the new avatar in subsequent API call.
fixes: #3853
- Introduced DISABLE_GRAVATAR Global Config, which will stop chatwoot from making API requests to gravatar
- Cleaned up avatar-related logic and centralized it into the avatarable concern
- Added specs for the missing cases
- Added migration for existing installations to move the avatar to attachment, rather than making the API that results in 404.
When an agent updates a contact email in the dashboard and the contact also update his email via the email collect box,
Merge action receives the same base and mergee contacts which could cause data corruption.