Facebook inbox creation failures in Settings could leave users on the
same screen without explaining what went wrong. This change preserves
the backend error response and displays it through the existing toast
mechanism, making account-limit and other creation failures visible and
actionable.
The shared action now passes the original API error through, so the
newer onboarding flow also receives the specific backend message.
Successful Facebook inbox creation remains unchanged.
### How to reproduce
1. Use an account that has reached its inbox limit.
2. Go to Settings → Inboxes → Add Inbox → Facebook.
3. Select a Facebook Page and create the inbox.
4. Previously, the loading state ended without any visible error.
### How to test
1. Attempt Facebook inbox creation while the backend returns an HTTP 402
account-limit error.
2. Confirm the returned error appears as a toast message.
3. Retry after increasing the account limit and confirm inbox creation
continues normally.
### Things to know
The toast falls back to a generic localized creation error when the API
response does not contain a displayable message.
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR reworks the canned response picker to make it easier to search,
browse, and preview canned responses before inserting them. Typing `/`
now opens a larger picker with its own search field and a preview pane.
Previously, only a few responses were visible at a time, there was no
way to preview the full content, and searching relied on typing into the
composer, which stopped working for multi-word queries.
Search is now handled entirely inside the picker, so the composer stays
untouched while searching. Results match both the canned response
shortcut and its content, and each result shows a snippet centered
around the matched text instead of always displaying the beginning of
the response. The preview renders the response exactly as it will be
inserted, with variables resolved against the current conversation and
formatting unsupported by the channel already stripped.
The picker is positioned relative to the current typing line and
teleported to `body`, so it is no longer clipped by the composer. It
behaves consistently across the reply editor, the New Conversation
composer, and narrower editors such as Contact Notes, where the preview
moves below the list instead of disappearing.
This also fixes a pre-existing bug where variables without a value were
removed from the inserted text instead of being left for the backend to
resolve. In the New Conversation composer, where no variables are
available, all `{{ }}` placeholders were previously being silently
removed.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7854/inconvenient-canned-response-picker-and-lack-of-personal-canned
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
### Screenshots
<img width="1135" height="576" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b5f27b94-eeb5-4ac6-b6d9-da7dfd8c2306"
/>
<img width="393" height="490" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/779f88b1-4958-41f5-9f51-c2eb8db7e53c"
/>
### Steps
1. Open a conversation and type `/` in the reply editor.
2. Search using a multi-word phrase that appears within a canned
response. Verify the matching response appears with a snippet centered
around the matched text.
3. Navigate the results with the arrow keys or Tab and verify the
preview updates.
4. Press Enter or click a response to insert it, and press Escape to
close the picker.
5. Repeat in a narrow editor such as Contact Notes and verify the
preview pane moves below the list.
6. In the New Conversation composer, insert a canned response containing
variables and verify the `{{ }}` placeholders are kept rather than
removed.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
AgentBot-owned conversations are now treated as assigned across
conversation lists, counts, pagination, permissions, unread membership,
human auto-assignment, and advanced assignee filters.
## Closes
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7689/align-agent-bot-ownership-with-unassigned-counts-and-pagination
## Follow-ups
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7870/refresh-agentbot-ownership-state-when-deleting-an-agent-bot
tracks ownership refresh during AgentBot deletion.
-
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7899/refresh-saved-filter-totals-after-live-conversation-ownership-changes
tracks the existing saved-filter header count refresh gap.
## Why
The backend treated every conversation without a human assignee as
unassigned, even when an AgentBot owned it. The frontend already hid
AgentBot-owned conversations from the Unassigned list, so counts,
pagination, filters, unread membership, direct-access permissions, and
auto-assignment could disagree with the visible queue.
## What changed
- Treat conversations with either a human assignee or AgentBot owner as
assigned.
- Keep conversation counts, pagination, unread memberships, advanced
filters, and automation assignee conditions aligned with the shared
ownership semantics.
- Keep human assignee equality and not-equality filters human-only, even
when a human and AgentBot have the same numeric ID.
- Exclude AgentBot-owned conversations from both legacy and V2 human
auto-assignment, and from unassigned-only Enterprise access.
- Preserve AgentBot ownership when Twilio or WhatsApp call flows reuse
or accept an assigned conversation.
- Emit ownership-change updates when only the AgentBot owner changes, so
connected clients refresh queue state.
## Validation
- AgentBot assignment changed ownership to the bot, moved the
conversation to pending, and removed it from the open queue.
- Assignee "is present" returned human- and AgentBot-owned
conversations; "is not present" returned only genuinely unassigned
conversations.
- Automation assignee presence conditions treated AgentBot ownership as
present and did not execute the absent-owner path.
- Live human-assignee equality and not-equality filters excluded
AgentBot-owned conversations, including numeric ID collisions.
- A 32-conversation pending queue loaded across pagination with matching
totals and no missing or duplicate rows.
- AgentBot ownership changes and human takeover updated filtered rows
immediately without a reload.
- Human takeover opened the conversation and restored the public reply
composer; subsequent unassignment kept the conversation open.
- An unassigned-only custom-role agent saw only genuinely unassigned
conversations and could not see AgentBot-owned conversations.
- AgentBot-owned conversations showed the handled-by-bot banner, Take
over action, and disabled public reply composer.
- New conversations in the connected inbox were assigned to the AgentBot
and excluded from human auto-assignment.
- Opening an AgentBot-owned conversation did not let the legacy
assignment callback or its locked recheck replace the bot.
- Moving an AgentBot-owned conversation to an auto-assigning team
preserved the bot and did not create a second human owner.
- Twilio conference pickup, Twilio outbound reuse, WhatsApp outbound
reuse, and inbound WhatsApp acceptance preserved existing AgentBot
owners.
- Focused ownership, filters, pagination, permissions, unread-count,
auto-assignment, frontend, and lint checks passed locally.
- GitHub Actions, Docker builds, CircleCI, security checks, and the
final Codex review are green on the final head.
## Description
When `POST /api/v1/accounts/:id/conversations/filter` fails (for example
a 500 or a server-side timeout), the conversation list spinner never
clears because the Vuex action's catch block was empty. The user is
stuck on an infinite loader with no way to retry.
This change:
- Clears the list loading state (`CLEAR_LIST_LOADING_STATUS`) and
rethrows in `fetchFilteredConversations`, matching how sibling actions
in the module handle errors. Both applied filters and saved filters
(custom views) go through this action.
- Catches the rejection in `ChatList.vue` and shows an alert ("Couldn't
load conversations. Please try again.") so the user can retry.
- Guards the reconnect flow in `ReconnectService` so a failed filtered
fetch on websocket reconnect does not abort cache revalidation.
- Fixes the existing spec for the success path, which passed no
`dispatch` and was silently exercising the error path.
No client-side request timeout was added since the dashboard API layer
has no per-request timeout convention; the fix is scoped to error
handling.
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7831
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Added a spec asserting the loading state clears and the error is
rethrown when the filter request rejects: `pnpm test
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversations/actions.spec.js`
(49 passed).
- `pnpm test
app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/ReconnectService.spec.js` (24
passed).
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Account administrators can now browse synced WhatsApp message templates
inside Settings without opening a provider dashboard. The page combines
native WhatsApp and Twilio WhatsApp templates, with channel and language
filters, search, a template preview drawer, and links to manage
templates at the provider.
Creating, updating, and deleting templates in Chatwoot remains out of
scope for this first version.
Related:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-193/add-whatsapp-template-listing-to-account-settings
<img width="2742" height="1460" alt="CleanShot 2026-08-03 at 20 23
27@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5d0b7a98-f882-425a-b9ec-7d631371959c"
/>
### Things to know
- This is stack 2 of 2 and depends on API draft #15311.
- Review this PR against `codex/whatsapp-template-api`; after the API PR
lands, this branch can be rebased and retargeted to `develop`.
- Both native WhatsApp and Twilio WhatsApp template caches are
supported.
- Template management remains in Meta Business Portfolio or Twilio
Console.
### How to test
1. Open Settings → WhatsApp templates for an account with native and
Twilio WhatsApp inboxes.
2. Confirm templates from each inbox are listed with their status,
language, category, channel, and last-updated metadata.
3. Filter by channel and language, and search by template name or
content.
4. Open a template and confirm its preview renders in the drawer.
5. Use the provider action and confirm it opens the appropriate Meta or
Twilio template-management page.
6. Confirm loading, empty, and error states remain usable.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds a dashboard-only takeover path for pending conversations currently
handled by an assistant/bot. Agents see the warning by default, stay in
private-note mode while the conversation is pending, and can use Take
over to move the conversation back to human handling.
## Related
- Original scope:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7450/block-replies-and-add-takeover-for-agent-bot-ownership
- Backend follow-up:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7779/enforce-backend-reply-blocking-for-agent-bot-owned-conversations
## Why
We want to prevent accidental parallel handling from the dashboard while
an assistant is managing a pending conversation, without expanding this
PR into API-level enforcement. Backend blocking is tracked separately in
CW-7779.
## What changed
- Locks the dashboard composer to private-note mode while the
conversation status is `pending`.
- Shows the takeover banner by default for pending conversations.
- Uses the Agent Bot assignee name when the conversation payload exposes
one, otherwise falls back to `a bot`.
- Simplifies the banner action copy to `Take over`.
- Reopens and self-assigns the conversation from the takeover action.
- Clears stale local `AgentBot` assignee type when assigning the
conversation back to a human in the store.
## How to test
- Open a pending conversation assigned to an Agent Bot and verify the
banner says it is handled by that bot name.
- Verify the reply editor stays in private-note mode and public reply
mode cannot be selected while the conversation is pending.
- Click Take over and verify the conversation moves to open and is
assigned to the current agent.
- Open a pending Captain/Dialogflow-style conversation without an Agent
Bot assignee payload and verify the banner falls back to `a bot`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Moves the WhatsApp & Twilio content-template logic to the shared
[`@chatwoot/utils`](https://github.com/chatwoot/utils)
([PR](https://github.com/chatwoot/utils/pull/62)) package so web and
mobile share one implementation. The neutral core takes the raw template
and returns `processed_params`, the same shape the web parsers already
use, so it's a drop-in with no behavior change.
- `templateHelper.js` / `URLHelper.js` → source `MEDIA_FORMATS`,
`findComponentByType`, `processVariable`, `buildTemplateParameters`,
`extractFilenameFromUrl` from the package
- `inboxes.js` → filters with shared `isSendableTemplate`
- `WhatsAppTemplateParser.vue` / `ContentTemplateParser.vue` →
`isFormInvalid` and Twilio media helpers now use the shared
`isWhatsAppComplete` / `isTwilioComplete` / `applyTwilioMediaFilename`
> Depends on the `@chatwoot/utils` release adding the shared template
API, bump `package.json` from `^0.0.55` to the published version before
merge.
Fixes
[CW-7540](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7540/web-templates-integration-with-utils)
## Type of change
- [x] Breaking change (Refactor)
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
The conversation sidebar counts (`GET /conversations/meta`) are polled
on a debounced cadence selected from the last known conversation count
(`allCount` in the `conversationStats` store).
`allCount` starts at `0` and is only set after a **successful** meta
response. When the meta query is slow or failing under load, `allCount`
stays `0`, which selected the fastest cadence, so every client polled as
aggressively as possible exactly when the endpoint was already
struggling. On large accounts with many concurrent agents this
multiplies into sustained load that keeps the query slow, a
self-reinforcing loop.
This PR makes two changes:
1. **Treat an unknown count (`0`) as a large account** and poll at the
slowest cadence instead of the fastest (`getMetaDebounceKey`, extracted
as a pure, testable function). This breaks the failure loop.
2. **Raise the debounce intervals across all tiers** so counts are
polled less frequently under sustained activity:
- fast: max 1 poll / 2s -> 1 / 5s
- mid: 1 / 10s -> 1 / 20s
- slow (large/unknown accounts): 1 / 20s -> 1 / 30s
First-load counts still render immediately (the debounce fires on the
leading edge for the very first call), so the higher intervals only
affect the sustained poll rate, not initial render.
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Description
Adds the account-level `unread_count_for_filters` feature flag as the
dark-launch gate for filtered sidebar unread counts. This reuses the
deprecated `quoted_email_reply` flag slot, resets the reused bit for
existing accounts, and removes stale defaults so new accounts do not
reference the old flag.
This also adds the feature where we are now calculating the unread counts for built in filters like mentions, participating and unattended along with unread count for saved filters/folders.
Closes
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## Linear ticket
- https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7253/billing-brl-pix-new-users
## Description
New accounts that sign up in Brazilian Portuguese are now billed in BRL
instead of USD. Their Stripe customer is created with a Brazil address
and Portuguese locale (so the Stripe portal offers Real prices and PIX),
and the AI credit top-up flow shows packages priced in the account's
billing currency. Currency support is config-driven, so adding another
currency later is a configuration change rather than a code change.
## Type of change
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- https://www.loom.com/share/c8d3d08c1b844ed6b820438d4209491a
## Screenshot
<img width="904" height="440" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6f19fad8-e6af-46ea-b99f-b0265bb9eeec"
/>
## Checklist:
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Reverts [#14726](https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14726)
(\"feat: Add sidebar unread counts for filters (CW-7262)\"), which
shipped in 4.15.0.
After 4.15.0 rolled out to prod the unread-counts-for-filters code path
caused a cascading incident:
- `Counter#ensure_filters_cache!` fires on every `/unread_counts/index`
and `update_last_seen` request.
- On cache miss it calls `Builder#build_filters_for!`, which:
- invokes `store.clear_user_filters!` -> `delete_matching` -> a Redis
`SCAN_each` over a per-user pattern keyspace, and
- runs 4 fresh SQL passes per user (mentions, participating, unattended,
and per-folder `Conversations::FilterService` queries).
- Threads blocked in the SCAN held their DB connections, the connection
pool exhausted, Sidekiq jobs were discarded with
`ActiveJob::DeserializationError: could not obtain a connection from the
pool`, and the enqueued queue blew past 200K.
Related:
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
## Description
Extends the conversation unread-count system so the left sidebar can
show unread badges for Mentions, Participating, Unattended, and saved
conversation folders. Folder badges reuse the existing `custom_filters`
conversation filter semantics, store user-scoped Redis sets lazily, and
skip unsupported folder filters so invalid saved folders continue to
render without a badge. The Unattended badge counts all visible unread
open conversations that match the existing unattended conversation
scope.
Closes
-
[CW-7262](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7262/unread-counts-for-filters-folders)
## What changed
- Added user-scoped unread-count Redis keys and cache builders for
mentions, participating conversations, unattended conversations, and
saved folder filters.
- Reused `Conversations::FilterService` through a relation-returning
path so folder counts match the folder conversation list behavior.
- Invalidated user filter caches from mention, participant,
custom-filter, and relevant conversation update events.
- Extended the unread-count endpoint payload and sidebar Vuex/sidebar
rendering for the new badge counts, including the Unattended sidebar
item.
- Added Ruby, Enterprise, request, listener, and frontend store coverage
for the new unread-count dimensions.
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Created local validation folders for `john@acme.inc` and confirmed the
unread-count payload includes open, resolved, and high-priority folder
badges while excluding the invalid unsupported folder.
- Added coverage for the Unattended badge rule: all visible unread open
conversations matching `Conversation.unattended`.
- Ran focused unread-count Ruby specs, including service, listener,
request, and Enterprise counter coverage.
- Ran frontend unread-count store specs.
- Ran RuboCop on the touched Ruby files.
- Ran ESLint through the project script; it completed with warnings in
existing unrelated files and no errors.
<img width="369" height="525" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-13 at 10 51 39 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36b1d2c4-dac1-4f6f-9c0e-7ef5a6cc2975"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [x] Documentation changes are not required for this internal
unread-count behavior
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] No dependent downstream changes are required
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Adds a company selector to the contact details form so agents can
associate a contact with an existing company directly from the contact
page.
Closes
- None
Why
Contacts already expose company information through the CRM fields, but
the form only accepted free-text company names. As we split company CRM
work into smaller PRs, this keeps the contact page aligned with the
structured company model while preserving the existing company-name
behavior used by automations.
What changed
- Shows a company dropdown in the contact details form when the
Companies feature is enabled.
- Keeps legacy free-text company names editable when a contact has no
structured `company_id`.
- Allows Enterprise contact create/update APIs to accept account-scoped
`company_id`.
- Syncs `additional_attributes.company_name` when a contact is
associated with a company, including the existing email-domain
auto-association path.
- Serializes `company_id` in the contact model payload so the form can
show the current association.
How to test
1. Enable Companies for an account and open a contact details page.
2. In Edit contact details, use the Company field to select an existing
company.
3. Save the contact and refresh the page.
4. Confirm the selected company remains visible and the contact is
associated with that company.
5. Confirm contacts with only a legacy free-text company name still show
the text input instead of an empty selector.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <2040199+sony-mathew@users.noreply.github.com>
## Description
* Added the ability to sort for 4 sub-sections under conversations
folders, teams, channels and labels.
* the sort options are basically created at, alphabetical and unread
counts along with both directions.
* for folders we don't have an unread count, so we sort it by only
created and alphabetical.
* all the sort preferences are stored on the frontend - easiest
implementation for now.
Fixes # CW-7193
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested this locally by visually verifying the changes. Also ran the
newly added tests for component level changes.
Here is the screenshot of the changes:
Added the sort option to sub sections in the conversation sidebar:
<img width="282" height="848" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-02 at 1 58 12 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4a7c6061-86e3-438a-92ae-ee643a0128b6"
/>
The sort options looks like this:
<img width="783" height="698" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-02 at 1 58 49 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a15bb0a7-b810-4423-a88c-fbd84d0476c0"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
## Description
This PR fixes a data-corruption bug in the new conversation flow that
surfaces in conversation search results as `Subject: undefined`.
### The Problem
When creating a conversation through the "New conversation" modal
without typing a subject (every non-email channel never shows the
subject input, and email channels can be left blank), the conversation
gets persisted with `additional_attributes.mail_subject = "undefined"`
(the literal string). The bogus value shows up in conversation search
results as `Subject: undefined`, which started rendering after #10843.
### Root Cause
`createConversationPayload` in
`app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/contactConversations.js` appends
the `mail_subject` field unconditionally:
```js
payload.append('additional_attributes[mail_subject]', mailSubject);
```
`composeConversationHelper.js` only sets `payload.mailSubject` when
`subject` is truthy, so when no subject is provided, `mailSubject` is
destructured as `undefined` in `createConversationPayload`.
`FormData.append` coerces `undefined` to the string `"undefined"`, and
the backend persists it as-is into the JSONB column.
### The Fix
Skip the append when `mailSubject` is falsy. The backend already treats
a missing key the same as an empty subject (the email mailer falls back
to a default subject when `mail_subject` is `nil`), so omitting the
field is safe across channels.
### Key Changes
- Guarded the `additional_attributes[mail_subject]` append in
`createConversationPayload`.
- Added a spec covering the case where `mailSubject` is omitted.
> Note: existing rows persisted before this fix will continue to show
`Subject: undefined` in search until cleaned up. A simple SQL cleanup
for non-email inboxes:
>
> ```sql
> UPDATE conversations
> SET additional_attributes = additional_attributes - 'mail_subject'
> FROM inboxes
> WHERE conversations.inbox_id = inboxes.id
> AND inboxes.channel_type <> 'Channel::Email'
> AND conversations.additional_attributes->>'mail_subject' =
'undefined';
> ```
>
> I'm leaving any data-cleanup migration out of this PR since it's a
maintenance concern that may be handled differently per installation.
## Type of change
- [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Open the "New conversation" modal on a non-email inbox (e.g.,
WhatsApp, SMS, API).
2. Create a conversation without filling any subject (field is not
present on those, so regular flow).
3. Open the global search and search for the conversation.
4. **Before:** the result card shows `Subject: undefined`.
**After:** the subject row is hidden.
5. Repeat on an email inbox leaving the subject blank — same result.
6. On an email inbox, type a subject and verify it still persists and
renders correctly.
7. Run the new spec: `pnpm test contactConversations`.
## Checklist:
- [X] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [X] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [X] My changes generate no new warnings
- [X] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [X] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sony Mathew <sony@chatwoot.com>
## Description
Adds the unread count for All Conversations to the left sidebar. The
unread counts API now returns an `all_count` aggregate based on the same
permission-scoped inbox counts already used for sidebar badges, and the
sidebar renders that backend-provided value on the All Conversations
item.
Fixes
[CW-7240](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7240/unread-count-for-all-conversations)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- `bundle exec rspec
spec/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb`
- `pnpm test
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/actions.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/getters.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/mutations.spec.js`
- `pnpm exec eslint
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/sidebar/Sidebar.vue
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversationUnreadCounts.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/actions.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/getters.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/specs/conversationUnreadCounts/mutations.spec.js`
- `bundle exec rubocop
app/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter.rb
spec/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/enterprise/services/conversations/unread_counts/counter_spec.rb
spec/controllers/api/v1/accounts/conversations_controller_spec.rb`
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
Adds a Contact condition to the conversation advanced filter so agents
can search for an existing contact and filter conversations by
`conversations.contact_id`.
Fixes
[CW-7239](https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-7239/contact-filter-for-conversations)
## Type of change
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rspec
spec/services/conversations/filter_service_spec.rb`
- `pnpm exec vitest --no-watch --no-cache --no-coverage --logHeapUsage
app/javascript/dashboard/components-next/filter/helper/filterHelper.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversations/helpers/specs/filterHelpers.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/customViewsHelper.spec.js
app/javascript/dashboard/helper/specs/filterQueryGenerator.spec.js`
- `pnpm eslint`
- `eval "$(rbenv init -)" && bundle exec rubocop
spec/services/conversations/filter_service_spec.rb`
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts #14610 so conversation unread counts are again controlled
by the `conversation_unread_counts` feature flag across the API,
ActionCable broadcasts, notifier/listener paths, and dashboard sidebar
fetching.
## Closes
- None
## What changed
- Restores feature-flag checks for conversation unread count reads and
broadcasts.
- Restores the dashboard feature flag constant and sidebar/store
behavior for disabled unread counts.
- Restores the specs that cover disabled-feature behavior.
## How to test
- In an account with `conversation_unread_counts` enabled, verify
sidebar unread counts are fetched and updated in real time.
- Disable `conversation_unread_counts` for the account and verify unread
count requests/broadcasts are skipped.
## Description
Make conversation unread counts always available at runtime by removing
account feature checks from the API endpoint, unread-count listener,
notifier, and ActionCable broadcast path.
Update the dashboard to fetch sidebar unread counts for the active
account without checking FEATURE_FLAGS.CONVERSATION_UNREAD_COUNTS, and
remove the now-unused store clear action that only supported the
disabled state.
Keep the feature entry in config/features.yml to preserve flag bit
order, but mark it enabled and deprecated so fresh installs default to
the always-on behavior while feature-management UI hides it.
Leave existing installation default rows untouched; no migration is
included, so upgraded installs may still store the old flag value but
runtime behavior no longer depends on it.
Update specs around the new always-on contract and remove obsolete
disabled-feature assertions.
Fixes # CW-7237
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Update specs around the new always-on contract and remove obsolete
disabled-feature assertions. Ran specs locally for the changes.
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
Depends on: https://github.com/chatwoot/chatwoot/pull/14370
This PR creates a new onboarding controller, this allows more control
that the default account update API. Allowing us to spin tasks and
update details required specifically during the onboarding flow
On high-volume accounts, the dashboard sidebar's conversation count
badges fall behind because a meaningful share of
`/api/v1/accounts/:id/conversations/meta` requests get rate-limited
(per-user throttle, default 30 req/min).
Root cause is in `conversationStats.js`. The tiered debounce uses
`allCount` from the last response to pick a wait interval. `allCount`
reflects the user's *current filtered scope*, not the account's true
volume — so an agent viewing a small filter on a busy account falls into
the most aggressive tier (500ms wait / 1.5s maxWait → up to 40
calls/min/tab) and trips the throttle.
## What changed
`app/javascript/dashboard/store/modules/conversationStats.js`:
- Short-tier `maxWait`: `1500 → 2000` (caps short-tier at 30/min/tab
instead of 40)
- Super-long-tier threshold: `allCount > 5000 → > 2000` (more
high-volume accounts fall into the safe 3/min/tab tier)
- Middle-tier threshold unchanged (`> 100`)
| Tier (allCount) | wait / maxWait | Calls/min/tab |
|---|---|---|
| `> 2000` | 10s / 20s | 3 |
| `> 100` | 5s / 10s | 6 |
| else | 500ms / 2s | 30 |
## Trade-off
Badge updates (including those triggered by the agent's own action) may
lag by up to the tier's `maxWait` — worst case 20s for accounts with >
2000 open conversations in the active scope. The conversation list
itself and push notifications continue to update in real time; only the
numeric badge is debounced.
## Not in scope
- Sticky-max `allCount` to fix the underlying tier-selection signal —
defer until the simpler tuning is validated in production
- Optimistic count updates on local user actions — adds non-trivial
state management for a cosmetic lag
## Summary
Frontend for WhatsApp Cloud Calling: header / contact-panel call
buttons, ringing widget, accept/reject/hangup, mute, in-bubble audio
player + transcript, recording-on-hangup upload, mid-call reload
warning. WebRTC is browser-direct to Meta — no media server bridge.
## Closes
- https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-150
## How to test
Requires backend support — the controller, services, model changes, and
routes ship in **#14334** (`feature/pla-150`). Merge / deploy that first
(or simultaneously); the FE alone won't function without those
endpoints.
Then on staging, for a WhatsApp Cloud + embedded-signup inbox with the
new \`Configuration → Enable voice calling\` toggle ON and webhook
registered:
1. **Outbound** — open a conversation, click the phone icon in the
conversation header (or contact panel), grant mic, your phone rings,
answer, audio both ways, hang up. Recording + transcript land in the
bubble within ~10s.
2. **Inbound** — call the business number from your phone. The
FloatingCallWidget appears bottom-right with caller name. Click accept,
audio both ways, hang up. Recording + transcript appear.
3. **Mute** — during an active WhatsApp call, click the mic icon next to
hangup. Speech stops reaching Meta until you click again.
4. **Mid-call reload guard** — try `Cmd-R` during an active call;
browser shows a confirm prompt.
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This is the third and final PR in a series of PRs for Introducing unread
counts in the sidebar for inboxes and labels.
In this PR:
* Added frontend changes to show the badges for unread counts for
Inboxes and Labels
* Added specs for the changes
Issue:
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6851/support-unread-conversation-counts
## Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing
functionality not to work as expected)
- [ ] This change requires a documentation update
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested this locally. Cases to test:
* Send a message from the widget and see if the count changes
* Mark a conversation as unread and see the count change for inbox
* Open an unread conversation as agent and see the count go down
* Add a label to an unread conversation from sidebar right click action
without opening the conversation and see the count of un-reads on the
label change
Added the screenshot of how it will look like
<img width="614" height="990" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-05 at 7 00 11 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/99fbaa9f-bcf2-4d8d-86e2-5727f652a9dd"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
- Validates openai key while configuring hooks
- added backfill logic
Fixes # (issue)
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide
instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details
for your test configuration.
locally
<img width="1710" height="1234" alt="CleanShot 2026-04-15 at 16 15
02@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d319fe0-19f9-4fd0-9308-74987daac2e1"
/>
<img width="2884" height="1136" alt="CleanShot 2026-05-11 at 19 22
53@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5eae8650-985b-4c4a-af42-35f7175ff52d"
/>
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Narayanan <iamwishnu@gmail.com>
### Description
Inbound voice calls now route ownership cleanly: the call widget is
hidden from agents who aren't the conversation assignee, the first agent
to pick up becomes the assignee, and any later join attempt by another
agent is rejected with a clear "<agent> is already handling the call."
alert.
Closes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-98/inbound-voice-calls-assignment-aware-visibility-auto-assignment-on
### How to test
1. As Agent A and Agent B, open the dashboard for the same voice inbox
in two browsers.
2. Place an inbound call to the inbox with the conversation
**unassigned** — both agents should see the call widget.
3. Have Agent A click **Join**. Agent A's widget transitions to the
active call; Agent B's widget disappears (conversation is now assigned
to Agent A).
4. While the call is in progress, attempt to join from a third agent
(e.g., via the bubble in the conversation timeline) — the join is
rejected with the toast `Agent A is already handling the call.`
5. Resolve the conversation, then place a second call to a conversation
that is already manually assigned to Agent A — only Agent A sees the
widget; nobody else does.
6. Race test: trigger two near-simultaneous join attempts (two agents
click Join within a few hundred ms of each other) — exactly one wins;
the other gets the conflict alert.
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Twilio voice now uses first-class `Call` records as the source of truth
for call state, instead of storing it on
`conversation.additional_attributes` and `conversation.identifier`. Each
call gets its own record, its own `voice_call` bubble matched by
`call_sid`, and its own conference name keyed off `Call.id`. Multiple
calls on the same conversation (for `lock_to_single_conversation`
inboxes) now work correctly, and the conversation card stays in sync
with the real latest message.
Fixes https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/PLA-121/lock-to-single-thread
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin <12408980+muhsin-k@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds the ability to translate help center articles to other languages using Captain's LLM infrastructure. Translated articles are created as drafts linked to the source article.
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6901/translate-article-to-another-language
**How to test**
1. Navigate to Help Center → Articles for a portal with multiple locales
2. Click the three-dot menu on any article → "Translate"
3. Select a target language and category → click Translate
4. Switch to the target locale — the translated article appears as a
draft
5. Try translating the same article again — a warning shows the existing
translation with a link to open it in a new tab
6. Click "Overwrite and translate" to replace the existing translation
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1d2e991b-f0ac-403a-bcc1-2181b5731ea4
## Summary
This PR enables the **Participating** conversation view in the main
sidebar and keeps the behavior aligned with existing conversation views.
## What changed
- Added **Participating** under Conversations in the new sidebar.
- Added a guard in conversation realtime `addConversation` flow so
generic `conversation.created` events are not injected while the user is
on Participating view.
- Added participating route mapping in conversation-list redirect helper
so list redirects resolve correctly to `/participating/conversations`.
## Scope notes
- Kept changes minimal and consistent with current `develop` behavior.
- No additional update-event filtering was added beyond what existing
views already do.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sivin Varghese <64252451+iamsivin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: iamsivin <iamsivin@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
This PR adds inline editing support for contact name, phone number,
email, and company fields in the conversation contact sidebar
## Type of change
- [x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
## How Has This Been Tested?
**Screencast**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e9f8e37d-145b-4736-b27a-eb9ea66847bd
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Pranav <pranav@chatwoot.com>
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
# Pull Request Template
## Description
### Description
This PR fixes an issue where the editor would reset content and move the
cursor while typing. The issue was caused by a dual debounce setup
(400ms + 2500ms) that saved content and then overwrote local state with
stale API responses while the user was still typing.
### What changed
* Editor now uses local state (`localTitle`, `localContent`) as the
source of truth while editing
* Vuex store is only used on initial load or navigation
* Replaced dual debounce with a single 500ms debounce (fewer API calls)
* `UPDATE_ARTICLE` now merges updates instead of replacing the article
* Prevents status changes from wiping unsaved content
* Removed `updateAsync` for a simpler update flow
### How it works
User types
→ local ref updates immediately (editor reads from this)
→ 500ms debounce triggers
→ dispatches `articles/update`
→ API persists the change
→ on success: store merges the response (used by other components)
→ editor remains unaffected (continues using local state)
Fixes
https://linear.app/chatwoot/issue/CW-6727/better-syncing-of-content-the-editor-randomly-updates-the-content
## Type of change
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## How Has This Been Tested?
1. Open any Help Center article for editing
2. Type continuously for a few seconds — content should not reset or
jump
3. Change article status (publish/archive/draft) while editing — content
should remain intact
4. Test on a slow network (use DevTools throttling) — typing should
remain smooth
## Checklist:
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [x] I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand
areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
---------
Co-authored-by: Muhsin Keloth <muhsinkeramam@gmail.com>
Account webhooks sign outgoing payloads with HMAC-SHA256, but agent bot
and API inbox webhooks were delivered unsigned. This PR adds the same
signing to both.
Each model gets a dedicated `secret` column rather than reusing the
agent bot's `access_token` (for API auth back into Chatwoot) or the API
inbox's `hmac_token` (for inbound contact identity verification). These
serve different trust boundaries and shouldn't be coupled — rotating a
signing secret shouldn't invalidate API access or contact verification.
The existing `Webhooks::Trigger` already signs when a secret is present,
so the backend change is just passing `secret:` through to the jobs.
Shared token logic is extracted into a `WebhookSecretable` concern
included by `Webhook`, `AgentBot`, and `Channel::Api`. The frontend
reuses the existing `AccessToken` component for secret display. Secrets
are admin-only and excluded from enterprise audit logs.
### How to test
Point an agent bot or API inbox webhook URL at a request inspector. Send
a message and verify `X-Chatwoot-Signature` and `X-Chatwoot-Timestamp`
headers are present. Reset the secret from settings and confirm
subsequent deliveries use the new value.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sojan Jose <sojan@pepalo.com>
